Not an issue with Sarracenia, since they're native, but in the case of any non-native species one should not forget the far reaching implications of the Lacey Act when shipping plants interstate.
Oops, sorry, post deleted. I thought you were talking about ESA/CITES.
Originally Posted by SubRosa
Last edited by utricularia; 05-06-2013 at 03:54 PM.
Reason: Chicken fried steak
"You are allowed to GIFT"- agreed
Originally Posted by Brie
"and/or trade"- I am not so sure. In a trade- you have an exchange of value. I do not have the text in front of me and am not qualified to interpret the law, but I was advised by someone well versed in this stuff (works in conservation) that when shipping endangered sarracenias there is to be no personal material benefit. It seems to me that if you are bartering- you are really only a step or two removed from a sale.
Where the heck is NaN when we all need him? WARREN!!! HELP!! (j/k)
Again though, I could be wrong about the trading issue- personally, I don't think so- I have heard that from more than one well educated source.