What's new
TerraForums Venus Flytrap, Nepenthes, Drosera and more talk

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What would happen if

  • Thread starter fc3srx713b
  • Start date
  • #21
Halle Berry would get my vote...she would charm those foriegn leaders right out of the trees...or where ever they roost.  
smilie4.gif


Seriously though; Anne Coulter who wrote the book, "How to talk to a liberal"...If you must?  She would be a great president.

What about PAK?
 
  • #22
[b said:
Quote[/b] (fc3srx713b @ Oct. 12 2005,11:18)]how about barba strizan ( i think thats how its spelled)
smile_l_32.gif
Oy Vey! Barbra Streisand? LOL!
 
  • #23
I wouldn't choose Hillary, but I'd sure vote for her over the guy we have now (worst President EVER.)

Did you notice the lates WSJ poll? Not only is his approval rating at a staggering 39%, but his approval among blacks is 2%. TWO PERCENT. For shame!

Capslock
 
  • #24
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Lauderdale @ Oct. 13 2005,8:23)]Halle Berry would get my vote...she would charm those foriegn leaders right out of the trees...or where ever they roost.  
smilie4.gif
yeah i bet!
smile_m_32.gif

that movie in sowordfish sure will get my vote for her if you know what i mean
laugh.gif
 
  • #25
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]Did you notice the lates WSJ poll? Not only is his approval rating at a staggering 39%, but his approval among blacks is 2%. TWO PERCENT. For shame!
That's because most of his supporters are white overzealous supernazichristians.
 
  • #26
Thanks for the vote Jan. lol I'd love to lead the country. There would be a LOT of laws I'd be changing.
smile.gif


I think a female president would be great. Women have more common sense than men. They listen better, have more patience and don't have that "male supremacy" thing to deal with.
smile_l_32.gif


As far as a woman who is qualified now...I'm not sure. I'd have to think on that.
 
  • #27
I totally agree. There'd be alot less BS in the world right now just from the absence of.. ego wars (replacing a word my mom uses in that phrase with the word "ego"). Men were not made to be world leaders. They were meant to kill junk. Women, on the other hand, have much more technical minds and better problem-solving skills and actually think ahead and plan before throwing themselves right into it.
 
  • #28
[b said:
Quote[/b] (PlantAKiss @ Oct. 14 2005,4:04)]Thanks for the vote Jan. lol I'd love to lead the country. There would be a LOT of laws I'd be changing.
smile.gif


I think a female president would be great. Women have more common sense than men. They listen better, have more patience and don't have that "male supremacy" thing to deal with.
smile_l_32.gif


As far as a woman who is qualified now...I'm not sure. I'd have to think on that.

[b said:
Quote[/b] ]I totally agree. There'd be alot less BS in the world right now just from the absence of.. ego wars (replacing a word my mom uses in that phrase with the word "ego"). Men were not made to be world leaders. They were meant to kill junk. Women, on the other hand, have much more technical minds and better problem-solving skills and actually think ahead and plan before throwing themselves right into it.


Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak Yak, Yak, Yak, Yak.

But no work would ever get done. All the world leaders would be saying "Yes dear" Just to end the yaking.


EDIT: Oh man, I'm going to really have to listen to some major yaking now.
smile_h_32.gif
 
  • #29
*grins* Nah, that would prove your point.

Actually, I get alot of BS for "never talking".
 
  • #30
FTG for prez!
 
  • #31
we would probably nuke another country every 28 days.

no in all seriousness, i get to vote in 2008 and i promise you if hillary runs i will vote for her unless she changes radically by that time.

if hillary doesn't run and condi does, i'll vote for her. NOT because i like her ideas or politics, but because i believe a black woman for president would open the door for many african americans and women. so i guess if condi runs and hillary doesn't i'll vote for condi for the greater good, even though i don't like her.
 
  • #32
Voting for President should be something that is taken seriously. You should vote for the person who you think is best fit, and also fits your values and beliefs. It shouldn't be something you wave in the air, your vote is more than going to the polls. It's your job as an American to educate yourself and vote for the person who you think should run the country.

Hillary Clinton would be the worse president ever. Woman or not, change or no change, I would never vote for Hillary. I've seen some pro's listed about having a woman president but what about the cons? I see women who are blinded by their emotions and unable to make a logical decisions. I think men tend to be more logical, and try to put aside emotions but this is all stereotyping I guess. I'm for a candidate that is qualified and shares my same Christian values such as pro-life.
 
  • #33
Ummm ...

"I see women who are blinded by their emotions and unable to make a logical decisions.  I think men tend to be more logical, and try to put aside emotions but this is all stereotyping I guess."

You shouldn't have to guess, unless you're blinded by your emotions.

By the way, it's hard to see Hillary as the worst president ever.  If not for the current occupant, she might be competitive.  But it's a record that's going to stand for a long time.  I hope.
 
  • #34
I see men who are blinded by their egos and unable to make logical decisions.

Not every woman is a hysterical, panicked radical controlled by their emotions. Some of us actually know how to keep our emotions out of it and think logically for stuff like that. Which is more than I can say for alot of men. And obviously our current president can't think ahead and plan things, otherwise he would have known what the war would do to this country and put his people above his pride and stay out of foreign affairs, as George Washington advised us.
 
  • #35
[b said:
Quote[/b] (FlytrapGurl @ Oct. 15 2005,12:21)]I see men who are blinded by their egos and unable to make logical decisions.
I'd prefer an egotistical person than an emotional person running the country i live in. Since in a real life situation (to me) an egotistical person would make a better decision than an emotional one. Well maybe women could run for president... but only as democrats...
smile_n_32.gif
 
  • #36
[b said:
Quote[/b] (FlytrapGurl @ Oct. 15 2005,12:21)]And obviously our current president can't think ahead and plan things, otherwise he would have known what the war would do to this country and put his people above his pride and stay out of foreign affairs, as George Washington advised us.
Our president can't think ahead and plan things? Have you been reading the L.A. Times too much? He obviously has a plan, he just can't give the people the exact time when all the troops will be pulled out. The war on terrorism is the first war of its kind, so it's not 100% modeled out.

What war would do to this country? Everyone knows what happens with war, people have to be sent to fight it and people die. It's part of this country's history. Godbless those unselfish people who are out there sacrificing their lives to ensure our freedom and safety.

He put us above his pride? This has nothing to do with pride. He's doing what he believes is the best for the U.S. and it's people.

George Washington? It is clearly obvious that you are on the left. You're stuck in yesterday's world, yesterday's policies. Back in George Washington's time they didn't have to worry about terrorists from the Middle East coming over here and hijacking airplanes and blowing up our buildings. Back in George Washington's time, the U.S. was pretty much isolated from the whole world. Today it's all about globalization. Today we have to be on the offensive and stop terrorists before they become a worse threat. If we don't it's just a matter of time before they are on our soil and killing more innocent people. That is why we can't just isolate ourselves from the world, it doesn't work like that way anymore. The more time we give them the more damage they will do to us. These people are merciless and don't think they wouldn't hesitate to strap on a nuke and detinate it. They don't value life. They don't value freedom.
 
  • #37
god bless the people who are fighting a war they dont support because they are the governments dogs untill their time is up.

president bush has a plan, i'm not sure he understands it himself though. his politics are completely moronic, like most republican values and policies.

i do agree with you, however, about George Washington not having to worry about that stuff. George Washington has nothing to do with this : )
 
  • #38
Well, it's clear Outsiders71 is among the rapidly shrinking group of people who haven't yet realized they've been scammed.  Try switching the radio to FM for some tunes and switching the TV from Fox.  You'd be amazed what's out there.

George W. Bush abandoned the "war on terror" to attack Iraq.  He and his fellow war criminal neocons have been having wet dreams about doing that for years.  Terrorism or no terrorism.  And one of our modern George's accomplishments is that the US is again "pretty much isolated from the whole world."  The dead George Washington is a better president than the live George Bush.  Meaning G.W.B.  G.H.W.B. wasn't bad.  And he knew better than to go into Iraq.
 
  • #39
[b said:
Quote[/b] (herenorthere @ Oct. 15 2005,8:16)]George W. Bush abandoned the "war on terror" to attack Iraq. He and his fellow war criminal neocons have been having wet dreams about doing that for years. Terrorism or no terrorism. And one of our modern George's accomplishments is that the US is again "pretty much isolated from the whole world." The dead George Washington is a better president than the live George Bush. Meaning G.W.B. G.H.W.B. wasn't bad. And he knew better than to go into Iraq.
He didn't abandon the "war on terror". I don't even think we have to go into the reasons why Saddam was better off removed for the Iraqi people. "G.W.B. attacked Iraq because <insert lame reasoning that Kerry spewed here>". Sure there are worse dictators out there, but you have to start somewhere. You also forget the fact that there was strong intelligence stating that Saddam had WoMD. Is this something we joke about? Especially after 9/11 and especially after we attacked Al Queda in Afghanistan? Do we take chances for another attack, a possible lethal chemical/nuke attack? The President is responsible for our safety, and the information that he had at the time (information that is not viewable by everyone), plus the U.N. investigation weirdness, he made the choice to attack.

You can't compre George Washington to George W. Bush. How do you know how Washington would have reacted to the events of G.W.B.'s? I highly doubt he would hide under his blanky and tell himself the enemy won't bother me if I hide.

What's wrong with you left wing folk? Don't you have any patriotism? We did not win our freedom by isolationg ourselves from our problems. Your whole anti-war campaign was just a gimmick to try to turn the Presidency over to the Democrats. Afterall your values, beliefs, and stances as a party couldn't win you the election alone. You need to quickly realize that there is no debate on the war on Iraq, it's over, it's done. It's time you support your troops who are over in Iraq trying to protect you. The ones who are shaking their head because unlike them you don't stand by America, and stand by their efforts which they believe is the right thing to do for the U.S. and the World.
 
  • #40
The Middle East is not "our problem". And you cannot eliminate the terrorist threat. It's never gonna happen. There will always be a terrorist regime in this world. There will always be people who do things different than us and we're gonna have to learn to deal with it and keep out of it instead of poking our noses in and provoking it even more.

Oh, I'm "behind the times" now because I'm not one of the 52% of the population that's brainwashed into thinking we have a good President just because he has "Christian values"? How sweet. Let's violate the part of the Bill of Rights that states that no governmental figure shall impose any one religion upon his people. Yeah, ban medical procedure and gay marriage (which is imposing Christianity upon the people). THAT'S the main problem in the world today, THAT will solve ALL our problems!! Don't get me wrong... I believe in God, I pray and I read the Bible every day. But I don't call myself a Christian because I don't share all of the Christian beliefs, most of which were never mentioned in the Bible (which was written by PEOPLE in the first place) anyway. And the most irrational thing about this presidency. Tax cuts for the wealthy? How the hell is that rational?

And by "what the war would do to this country", I wasn't only talking about drafting. I was talking about what it would physically do to this country. "Oil crisis" because of the wAr On TeRrOr. You think the price of gas won't keep going up? It will. And what happens when the MAJORITY of this country, working-class people, can't afford to drive anymore? What then?

I don't see how you can look up so much to someone who says junk like "You gotta solve problems with problem solvers"... "Is our children educated?"... and freely states that he'd like to "learn more about federal government". And you people call us unpatriotic rednecks...

I AM patriotic. I want what's best for this country, which is not this President. I want somebody in office who can think rationally, give tax cuts to people who need tax cuts, make sure we can afford to drive, make laws that will actually help solve problems in this country, not laws that will help advertise a religion for no reason, and try NOT to go to war every 5 minutes. Maybe then the entire world wouldn't hate us so much and we'd get something done.
 
Back
Top