User Tag List

Informational! Informational!:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 8 of 11

Thread: Digital cameras

  1. #1
    swords's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Cernunnos Woods
    Posts
    8,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    After finally giving up on my Kodak DC 3200 I've decided to break down and get a better model with at least 5.0 MP. I've been looking at the Nikon Coolpix 5700 since it has all sorts of 'semi-pro' features and add on accessories (lenses) for taking pics 1.5" (in macro) to infinity but I'm also looking at the Sony Moviepix ES (Correction it's called: Sony Cybershot DSC-f717 but what I typed originally is what's actually printed on the camera... ) which is about $400 less and may have more than enough zoom features for someone like me.

    Mostly I will be doing macro shots of plants but I would like to have a fully featured high image quality camera for taking on trips or any other needs. I will likely NEVER use the video modes on these cameras.


    Is anyone here familiar with either of these cameras? Do you have other suggestions? Thanks for any thoughts!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question

    Well I dont own either of these I use the Sony DSC-P1 that i bought a couple of years ago, I wont ever buy a film camera again. Digital is just incredible, and if you got the money and dont care about size then go with the Nikon you mentioned. Only reason I went with the sony was size and well for a compact camera the pictures are beautiful. The Nikon you mentioned will have no draw backs and picture quality is sure to amaze you. Plus, you wont have much need to upgrade that camera from what I read is pretty loaded. [img]http://www.**********.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif[/img]

    I dont know how you print your photos but I bought the Sony DPP-SV55 printer and the photos are just incredible. Give it a look its only $199 or less and the photo packs can be bought pretty cheap.

    Dave G.
    Life is to short not to try everything at least once!

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Bavaria, in the South of Germany
    Posts
    319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would recommend the Olympus C-4000 which is a relativly cheap but excellent 4M Camera. It has a very good(&#33[img]http://www.**********.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif[/img] super-makro mode, minimum objekt size is about 42x32 mm (in very good quality, which is NOT usual in makro mode !!&#33[img]http://www.**********.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif[/img] and you can crop a part of it if you only need "internet-quality".

    I don't own the camera but have a look at the best review pages :

    http://www.dpreview.com
    http://www.imaging-resource.com
    http://www.steves-digicams.com/diginews.html

    Martin

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Bavaria, in the South of Germany
    Posts
    319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    oh, I didnt read the "at least 5 MegaPixel" first.

    Hmmm, so, if you want to pay 300 $ more you can buy the Olympus C-5050, but it has another lens and I don't know if it is as good in macro.

    5 megapixel are not much better than 4 Megapixel because the sensor size doesn't increase. This eans that resolution is limited by the lens not the CCD in most 5MP consumer-cameras and the noise will significantly increase because of the very small size for one pixel.

    Martin

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ogden, UT
    Posts
    423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    excellent point. When buying a higher end camera pay close attention to the physical size of the ccd if you can find the specifications. Larger is significantly better.

    joe
    Signature.

  6. #6
    Moderator Schmoderator Fluorescent fluorite, England PlantAKiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia/Zone 7
    Posts
    10,335
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am also looking to upgrade my digital camera. So far, my pick is the Nikon Coolpix 5000. Everything I've read about it sounds very good. I have enjoyed my Olympus but it is limiting because of the macro issue. It does not take good close ups. I will have to check into the one Martin mentioned.

    Suzanne
    "Fox terriers are born with about four times as much original sin in them as other dogs." - Jerome K. Jerome

  7. #7
    swords's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Cernunnos Woods
    Posts
    8,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Suzanne the Coolpix 5700 has a few more 'semi-pro' features and an optical zoom of 8x combined with a digital of 4x to make '32x zoom'. It's macro mode is actually a further focus range 1.8" compared to the Sony DSC f717 which is 0.8" Many reviews state the Coolpix 5000 & 5700 has "too many" features and is a bit cumbersome to set up shots due to all the menus/features but does take great shots once set up but has a semi slow shutter. whereas most people who reviewed the Sony said they took great shots pretty much right out of the box and then explored the camera to discover all it could do and took even better shots after that. I sure wish I could rent the two cameras for a week and see what I think of 'em before I pay...!

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Bavaria, in the South of Germany
    Posts
    319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi !

    Macro mode : The minimum distance says nothing !!! Some cameras use it in wideangle, others in tele. The only thing you can compare is the minimum objekt size. It is much better if the camara shoots this with more(!) distance beacuse of distortion and shadow issuses.

    What do you mean with "semi-pro" and "too many features"
    _For me_: manuell exposure, manual zoom, manual withe balance, manual color balance, manual flash control, changing in camera sharpness, saturation, contrast and jpg compression is essential.

    Digital zoom : is abolute useless and only a marketing gag. Don't care about it, only optical zoom makes sense. (cropping the image later in photoshop will be the same as "digital zoom"

    Martin

    have a look at the review sites I mentioned and chose the camera best suited for your kind of photographie.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •