SF,
its obvious you dont understand anything I have said..
I cant discuss this with you when you have no understanding of the processes being discussed..
The crinoids got on top of mount everest due to plate tectonics.
there are mammal fossils "a few inches" below the surface due to erosion..
there are dinosaur fossils "a few inches" below the surface also due to erosion..
the 2 layers are many millions apart in age..
their location next to the current suface is utterly irrelevant.
To suggest today's different animals came about from "kinds" on the Ark is to support evolution!
How did all the differnt dogs come about then if only one "kind" was on the Ark?
sounds like you are supporting evolution..
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]Quote
I didn't say that they did. Like I said before, I think there are still dinosaurs today (BTW, if we found one, what would that do to your theory that they're all extinct?).
that didnt answer the question..
even if dinosaurs do still exist today, why are ALL dinosaur fossils found below ALL mammal fossils?
I also dont believe dinosaurs are extinct, they are now called birds. but dinosaurs are NOT the same as birds..its easy to tell the tell the difference between a fossil dinosaur, mammal, and bird..and all dinosaur fossils exist far below all mammal and bird fossils..your assumption that dinosaurs still exist today does nothing to explain that fact..
if they still exist today, explain why mammal fossils and dinosaur fossils do NOT appear in the same layers? ever.
Garbage. You just contradicted yourself twice.
You said:
1) Birds are modern Dinos
2) Dinos are not the same as birds
1)Dinos are not extinct
2)Yet ALL Dino bones are already below mammals? EXPLAIN THIS ONE!!!
its garbage to you, because you have clue what I am saying..
there is no contradiction in my words..
Birds evolved FROM dinosaurs..they are not the same creatures as the dinosaur fossils in the fossil record..
its an easy concept..
To suggest there were aquariums on the Ark is to create your own Biblical history..who are you to add words to the bible?
You are adding your own words to Gods words..
pretty arrogant if you ask me..
I suppose you think Noah had electricity as well to keep those aquariums heated? and filters for the biofiltration?
you need those as well to keep those fish alive..
but why not right? noah could have had electricity on the Ark! might as well just make up anything you like..
you cant be taken seriously if you just make up stuff out of thin air.
and its interesting you utterly ignored the question of how the Angelfish and tetras got to the ark in the first place..
please read this (entire) article to see why the Flood theory goes against all science and all reality as shown by the entire surface and interior of the earth.
written by a Christian:
Its EXCELLENT!
I highly suggest all Creationists read this..unless you prefer to just keep ignoring reality because that fits your beliefs better..
(thank you to who first suggested that article! I went back through this thread but I cant find the post where it was suggested to me! I searched through all the pages several times..I love the article!!)
http://www.geocities.com/vr_junkie/thebibleandscience.htm
you didnt answer any one of my questions!
none of my "issues" are yet to be explaind by the flood..
basically all your answers to those problems is "they arent really real"..
well sorry, they are very real..you just arent aware that they are real.
I cant argue against willfull ignorance..
if you would like to learn more about the truth of what the fossil record IS and what it looks like, and basic geology, then maybe we can discuss what possible processes made the earth look the way it does today.
but before you can discuss WHY the earth looks the way it does..you first have to understand what it looks like..
you dont know that yet...
I shall say no more..
I have made my points.
Scot