Here goes,
GET YOUR STATE OUT OF MY RELIGION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Marriage is an establishment of Jewish decent began in Biblical times. Ordained BY the BIBLE, and is defined as a HOLY union between a Man, and a woman. The problem you don’t seem to see is you’re on our religious toes. The term marriage is ours, but for your convinces you don’t seem to acknowledge that. If homosexuals want to enter into a union FINE just don’t call it marriage. How can we not use religion in a topic when marriage is OURS (the Christians). There within is the problem.
Now without using religion as a basis. NOBODY HAS YET TO EXPLAINE TO ME WHY WE’RE DISCRIMINATING IN FAVOR OF GAYS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WANT A UNION WITH BENEFITS. NOBODY HAS YET TO BRING UP A GOOD REASON WHY BROTHERS AND SISTERS LIVING TOGETHER TO TAKE CARE OF EACH OTHER, OR WIDOWS DOING THE SAME SHOULD NOT HAVE THE SAME BENEFITS AS A GAY COUPLE IN A UNION. WHY IF THE WIFE DIES AND A BROTHER MOVES IN, TO HELP HIS BROTHER MAKE ENDS MEET, OR THROUGH ANY GIVEN SCENARIO THEY CAN’T RECEIVE THE SAME BENEFITS. IF THAT’S ALL IT’S ABOUT – THE BENEFITS THAN WHO CARES.
BUT WHEN YOU ATTEMPT TO REDEFINE A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION YOU’RE PUTTING YOU’RE STATE UP MY BACKSIDE. STOP IT. IT IS A UNION-NO LESS LOVING I’M SURE, BUT DON’T USE MY RELIGIOUS TERMS TO DEFINE IT. YOU SEE MY RELIGION IS ALL FINE, AND GOOD, AND RELEVANT WHEN YOU STOOD AT THE ALTER WITH YOU’RE LOVED ONE.
HOW CAN YOU PICK AND CHOSE? HYPROCRACY AT IT’S BEST. SURE YOU WENT TO THE “JP” OR WHATEVER, BUT YOU STILL PARTOOK IN ONE OF MY RELIGIOUS CERAMONIES, AND ON TOP OF THAT UNLESS SOMEBODY WAS TOTIN’ A SHOOTGUN YOU WERE GLAD TO DO IT. HYPOCRITE !
GET YOUR STATE OUT OF MY RELIGION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Marriage is an establishment of Jewish decent began in Biblical times. Ordained BY the BIBLE, and is defined as a HOLY union between a Man, and a woman. The problem you don’t seem to see is you’re on our religious toes. The term marriage is ours, but for your convinces you don’t seem to acknowledge that. If homosexuals want to enter into a union FINE just don’t call it marriage. How can we not use religion in a topic when marriage is OURS (the Christians). There within is the problem.
Now without using religion as a basis. NOBODY HAS YET TO EXPLAINE TO ME WHY WE’RE DISCRIMINATING IN FAVOR OF GAYS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WANT A UNION WITH BENEFITS. NOBODY HAS YET TO BRING UP A GOOD REASON WHY BROTHERS AND SISTERS LIVING TOGETHER TO TAKE CARE OF EACH OTHER, OR WIDOWS DOING THE SAME SHOULD NOT HAVE THE SAME BENEFITS AS A GAY COUPLE IN A UNION. WHY IF THE WIFE DIES AND A BROTHER MOVES IN, TO HELP HIS BROTHER MAKE ENDS MEET, OR THROUGH ANY GIVEN SCENARIO THEY CAN’T RECEIVE THE SAME BENEFITS. IF THAT’S ALL IT’S ABOUT – THE BENEFITS THAN WHO CARES.
BUT WHEN YOU ATTEMPT TO REDEFINE A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION YOU’RE PUTTING YOU’RE STATE UP MY BACKSIDE. STOP IT. IT IS A UNION-NO LESS LOVING I’M SURE, BUT DON’T USE MY RELIGIOUS TERMS TO DEFINE IT. YOU SEE MY RELIGION IS ALL FINE, AND GOOD, AND RELEVANT WHEN YOU STOOD AT THE ALTER WITH YOU’RE LOVED ONE.
HOW CAN YOU PICK AND CHOSE? HYPROCRACY AT IT’S BEST. SURE YOU WENT TO THE “JP” OR WHATEVER, BUT YOU STILL PARTOOK IN ONE OF MY RELIGIOUS CERAMONIES, AND ON TOP OF THAT UNLESS SOMEBODY WAS TOTIN’ A SHOOTGUN YOU WERE GLAD TO DO IT. HYPOCRITE !