User Tag List

Informational! Informational!:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 88 of 147 FirstFirst ... 387884858687888990919298138 ... LastLast
Results 697 to 704 of 1176

Thread: Where does everyone stand in regards to...

  1. #697

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    2,344
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] ]Pop when pulled up from depths; their air bladders
    you mean their bladders (or is the stomach being pushed by the bladder?) come out of their mouth?
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish-Euripides
    wikipedia rocks! (except for species info)(CPers-add your vast knowledge of CPs to wikipedia&#33
    A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it
    Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything

  2. #698
    endparenthesis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,262
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  3. #699

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    2,344
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    not to be confused with the urinary bladder LOL
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish-Euripides
    wikipedia rocks! (except for species info)(CPers-add your vast knowledge of CPs to wikipedia&#33
    A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it
    Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything

  4. #700

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,211
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is definetly going in circles.

    I see no reason why Noah did not bring the insects on the ark. They are, as alphawolf says, land animals. They simply weren't mentioned directly as the birds and cattle were.
    1 Nxventrata

    D. muscipula & D. muscipula 'Red Dragon'(barely)

    Sarracenia leucophylla(seedling)

    S. purpurea and Drosera filiformis filiformis/ intermedia seeds waiting to sprout.

    Drosera capensis

  5. #701
    scottychaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Western New York, USA
    Posts
    2,970
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it really bothers me when people have to ADD things to the Bible to justify the flood!
    that is wrong!!

    "what about insects? were they on the ark?"
    "well..the bible doesnt mention them, but lets just assume they were there."

    "what about dinosaurs? were they on the ark?"
    "well..the bible doesnt mention them..but if they existed, then they were probably there"

    "what about trees? how did they survive the flood?"
    "well...lets assume.."
    etc etc..

    you cant ADD things to the Bible that arent there and then use the things you MADE UP as "proof"!
    and..God expressly forbids making up biblical "facts"..:

    Revelation 22:18-19: "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

    you cant make assumptions about what Noah did or did not have on the ark!!
    and you cant just make things up!!
    its not allowed..from a logic or a biblical standpoint..
    God forbids it..He said so.
    Scot

  6. #702
    endparenthesis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,262
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree.

    I also don't see the point in using science to back up claims about the flood logistics when you have to simultaneously ignore a massive amount of science indicating that it never happened in the first place. We've established science is completely unreliable in this scenario, so why bring it up at all?

  7. #703
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Westchester County, New York
    Posts
    5,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok. Crux of the debate lies here:

    "Science & evidence say x, y and z, which contradicts what the Bible says." - Basic sum up of evolutionist.

    "Well, God made everything look the way it does, because he's perfect, so the only reason science & evidence say x,y and z is because made it so."
    -Young Earth Creationist.

    How the heck does one argue with THAT?? [img]http://www.**********.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/new/confused.gif[/img]

    I mean, the flood didn't kill all that stuff AE & others said it would because God makes the rules & didn't want them dead.

    The geologic column was laid out the way it is by God.

    Everything is the magic man in the sky.


    Then you have the Old Earth Creationists, who make a lot more sense. They, at least, aknowledge that evolution occurs. Whether intelligent design or God just said "Go!" to see what happens, things change.



    17 Nash Rd.
    North Salem, NY 10560

    YOU! Outta my gene pool!

  8. #704

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom (Bristol, England) I am orriginnally from Mostar, Bosnia(one of the countries of former yugoslavia)
    Posts
    2,160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (schloaty @ Jan. 11 2005,11:28)]I mean, the flood didn't kill all that stuff AE & others said it would because God makes the rules & didn't want them dead.

    The geologic column was laid out the way it is by God.

    Everything is the magic man in the sky.
    Oh, adding stuff to the bible and presuming again?
    Where does it say that exactly?
    Carnivorous plants growlist:http://www.**********.com/cgi-bin....t=17597
    Onda je sultan pao mrtav do kostura

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •