I'm I the only one who interprets that as "if the resulting offspring are hybrids (which are unfit)"?[b said:Quote[/b] ]Italy show that natural selection will produce alleles that bar interracial matings if the resulting offspring are unfit hybrids. This is an important exception to the general rule that intermixing races will not tend to become separate species because the constant sharing of genes minimizes the genetic diversity requisite for speciation
First off why does new always appear in red bold.[b said:Quote[/b] (TheAlphaWolf @ Jan. 18 2005,7:37)]I'm I the only one who interprets that as "if the resulting offspring are hybrids (which are unfit)"?[b said:Quote[/b] ]Italy show that natural selection will produce alleles that bar interracial matings if the resulting offspring are unfit hybrids. This is an important exception to the general rule that intermixing races will not tend to become separate species because the constant sharing of genes minimizes the genetic diversity requisite for speciation
Uhhh.. because they vary genetically enough so that they are categorized?[b said:Quote[/b] (herenorthere @ Jan. 18 2005,7:42)]How are Sarracenias not all one species?
first of I don't know what red bold "new" you're talking about[b said:Quote[/b] ]First off why does new always appear in red bold.
Secondly what do you mean Alphawolf your question needs a few more words.
Thirdly What does "Italy show" (see quote). Does that mean Italy shows or it shows?
That makes NO sense to me at all.[b said:Quote[/b] (Treaqum @ Jan. 18 2005,7:44)]Italy show that natural selection will produce alleles that bar interracial matings if the resulting offspring are unfit hybrids. This is an important exception to the general rule that intermixing races will not tend to become separate species because the constant sharing of genes minimizes the genetic diversity requisite for speciation
Finch, I'm desperately fighting an ignorant battle.[b said:Quote[/b] (Finch @ Jan. 18 2005,10:18)]*pickes up A_E and throws him out a window*
bunch a help that provocative comments gonna do us
I didn't say whos side was ignorant did it. I didn't specify.[b said:Quote[/b] (ktulu @ Jan. 18 2005,10:34)]ignorant? are you saying anyone who believes in religion is ignorant? are you call the majority of people on the planet ignorant? im sorry A_E i hope you dont take this the wrong way but you need to open your mind to the possiblity that first you may be wrong, and secondly that just because someone has a differnt belief than you doesnt make them wrong/ignorant.
Never said any of the two.[b said:Quote[/b] (ktulu @ Jan. 18 2005,10:34)]first you may be wrong, and secondly that just because someone has a differnt belief than you doesnt make them wrong/ignorant.