What's new
TerraForums Venus Flytrap, Nepenthes, Drosera and more talk

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Law to prohibit keeping "dangerous animal"

Ozzy

SirKristoff is a poopiehead
Staff member
Supporter
Moderator
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2005/Bills/Senate/HTML/S1032v0.html

[b said:
Quote[/b] ]GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA

SESSION 2005

S D

SENATE DRS65248-LLf-79 (2/24)













Short Title: Protection of Inherently Dangerous Animals.


(Public)

Sponsors:


Senator Garwood.

Referred to:









A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT providing for the Protection of the public against the health and safety risks that Inherently Dangerous Animals pose and to protect the welfare of inherently dangerous animals.

The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:

SECTION 1. Chapter 19A of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new Article to read:

"Article 6.

"Protection of Inherently Dangerous Animals.

"§ 19A‑70. Intent.

(a) It is the intent of the General Assembly to protect the public against health and safety risks that inherently dangerous animals pose to the community and to protect the welfare of the individual animals held in private possession and at roadside zoos. The General Assembly finds that by their very nature these animals are wild and inherently dangerous and do not adjust well in captivity without sufficient provisions for animal welfare and professional animal care expertise.

(b) The General Assembly finds that inherently dangerous animals are extremely unpredictable and dangerous creatures; the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of United States Department of Agriculture (USDA/APHIS), the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA), the American Veterinary Medical Association, and numerous animal welfare and public safety organizations believe that only properly trained professionals and certified institutions should keep these animals.

© The General Assembly finds that care and handling of these inherently dangerous animals should be left to those qualified individuals who have the knowledge and means to maintain them properly; the average owner of an inherently dangerous animal lacks the specialized equipment and expertise necessary to provide properly for the containment, medical care, husbandry, and nutrition of a wild animal, and it is virtually impossible for an inherently dangerous animal to adapt to traditional household settings or inadequate living spaces and conditions.

"§ 19A‑71. Definitions.

(a) "Animal control authority" means the municipal or county animal control agency or a county sheriff in an area that does not have an animal control office.

(b) "Department" means the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

© "Inherently dangerous animal" means an animal that is capable of inflicting serious or fatal injuries, or which has the potential to become a menace to the public health or indigenous wildlife populations, whether the animal is bred in the wild or in captivity, and includes all hybrids of that animal. The term does not include indigenous wild animals, the taking or possessing of which are regulated by the Wildlife Resources Commission under Article 22 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes. The following are examples of inherently dangerous animals, but indigenous varieties of the listed classifications are not included within the definition, regardless of whether specifically exempted here:

(1.) Class Mammalia

a. Order Carnivora

1. Family Felidae (lions, tigers, leopards, ocelots, servals, etc.) – all species except domestic cats.

2. Family Canidae (wolves, foxes, jackals, etc.) – all species except domestic dogs and indigenous foxes.

3. Family Ursidae (bears) – all species except black bears.

4. Family Viverridae (only binturongs).

5. Family Procyonidae (only kinkajous and coatis).

6. Family Hyaenidae (hyenas, etc.) – all species.

b. Order Marsupialia – only kangaroos.

c. Order Perissodactyla – only rhinoceroses.

d. Order Primates (lemurs, monkeys, chimpanzees, gorillas) – all species.

e. Order Proboscidae (elephants, etc.) – all species.

f. Order Rodentia – only prairie dogs and Gambian rats.

(2) Class Reptilia

a. Order Squamata

1. Family Varanidae – only water monitors and crocodile monitors.

2. Family Boidae – all species whose adult length has the potential to exceed eight feet in length.

3. Family Colubridae – only boomslangs and African twig snakes.

4. Family Elapidae (cobras, mambas, etc.) – all species.

5. Family Nactricidae – only keelback snakes.

6. Family Viperidae (vipers) – only nonindigenous species.

7. Family Helodermatidae (beaded lizards, Gila monsters, etc.) – all species.

8. Family Hydrophiidae (sea snakes, etc.) – all species.

9. Family Atractaspidae (mole vipers, etc.) – all species.

b. Order Crocodilia (crocodiles, alligators, caimans, gavials, etc.) – all species.

The Department may declare any additional species, families, or classes of wild animals not specifically listed in G.S. 19A‑71© to be an inherently dangerous animal for the purposes of this Article if the animal meets the definition set forth in this subsection.(d) "Person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, organization, trade or professional association, firm, limited liability company, joint venture, association, trust, estate, or any other legal entity, and any officer, member, shareholder, director, employee, agent or representative of the entity.

(e) "Possessor" means any person who owns, possesses, keeps, harbors, brings into the State, acts as a custodian of, or has custody or control of, an inherently dangerous animal.

(f) "Wildlife sanctuary" means a nonprofit organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and its subsequent amendments, that operates a place of refuge where abused, neglected, unwanted, impounded, abandoned, orphaned, or displaced inherently dangerous animals are provided care for their lifetimes or are released back to their natural habitat and, with respect to any animal owned by the organization, does not:

(1) Conduct any activity that is not inherent to the animal's nature;

(2) Use the animal for any type of entertainment;

(3) Sell, trade, or barter the animal or the animal's body parts; or

(4) Breed the animal for any purpose.

"§ 19A‑72. Exemptions.

(a) The provisions of this Article do not apply to:

(1) Institutions accredited by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA) or under mentorship through the AZA.

(2) Duly incorporated nonprofit animal protection organizations housing an inherently dangerous animal at the written request of the animal control authority.

(3) Wildlife enforcement officers acting under the authority of this act.

(4) Animal control or law enforcement agencies or officers acting under the authority of this act.

(5) Licensed veterinary hospitals or clinics.

(6) Any wildlife sanctuary as defined in G.S. 19A‑71(f).

(7) Any licensed or accredited research or medical institution.

(8) Any licensed or accredited educational institution.

(9) Any lawfully operated circus or rodeo.

(10) A person temporarily transporting an inherently dangerous animal through the State if the transit time is not more than 96 hours and the animal is at all times maintained within a confinement sufficient to prevent the inherently dangerous animal from escaping.

"§ 19A‑73. Keeping of inherently dangerous animals prohibited.

(a) A person shall not own, possess, keep, harbor, bring into the State, act as a custodian of, or have custody or control of, an inherently dangerous animal, except in compliance with this Article.

(b) A person shall not breed an inherently dangerous animal.

"§ 19A‑74. Personal possession permit required for possessor.

(a) A person may not own, possess, keep, harbor, bring into the State, act as a custodian of, or have custody or control of, an inherently dangerous animal unless that person holds a personal possession permit for that animal issued by the Department. A person may obtain a personal possession permit for an inherently dangerous animal only if the following requirements are met:

(1) The person was in legal possession of the inherently dangerous animal prior to January 1, 2006, and is the legal possessor of the inherently dangerous animal.

(2) The person applies for and is granted a personal possession permit for each inherently dangerous animal in the person's possession by March 31, 2006.

(b) Persons who meet the requirements of subsection (a) of this section shall annually obtain a personal possession permit. From and after January 1, 2006, no new inherently dangerous animal shall be brought into possession under authority of a personal possession permit.

© A possessor shall file an application to receive a personal possession permit with the Department on forms provided by the Department. The application shall include the following:

(1) A written statement that sets forth at least the following information:

a. The name, address, telephone number, and date of birth of the possessor;

b. A description of the inherently dangerous animal possessed, including the scientific name, name, sex, age, color, weight, and any distinguishing marks or coloration that would aid in the identification of the animal;

c. A photograph of the inherently dangerous animal;

d. The address of the location where the inherently dangerous animal is to be kept, including directions to the location if no address exists;

e. The name, address, and telephone number of the person from whom the possessor obtained the inherently dangerous animal, if known;

f. The microchip number of the inherently dangerous animal, excluding inherently dangerous animals exempted under G.S. 19A‑75; and

g. The name, address, and telephone number of the veterinarian providing veterinary care to the inherently dangerous animal and a certificate of good health from the possessor's veterinarian.

(2) The possessor's certification in writing and notarized, that:

a. The applicant is 18 years of age or older;

b. The applicant has not been convicted of, or found responsible for, violating a State or local law prohibiting cruelty, neglect, or mistreatment of an animal, and has not within the past 10 years been convicted of a felony or convicted for possession, sale, or use of illegal narcotics;

c. The requirements set forth in subsection (a) of this section and of G.S. 19A‑75 have been met;

d. The facility and the conditions in which the inherently dangerous animal will be kept are in compliance with this Article;

e. The applicant has regularly provided veterinary care to the inherently dangerous animal when needed and will provide such care in the future; and

f. Proof that a licensed veterinarian has spayed or neutered the inherently dangerous animal, as required by G.S. 19A‑76.

(3) The possessor's plan for the quick and safe recapture of the inherently dangerous animal if the inherently dangerous animal escapes at the time of filing of the application.

(4) A copy of the possessor's policy for liability insurance at the time of filing of the application, as required by G.S. 19A‑79.

(5) Any additional information the Department may deem necessary to carry out the provisions of this Article.

(6) Payment of a fee to be established by the Department for application, issuance, and renewal of a personal possession permit in order to recover the costs associated with the administration and enforcement of this Article. The fee collected under this section may be used only to administer and enforce the provisions of this Article.

(d) A permit shall not be granted unless the Department finds that all of the requirements in subsection © of this section have been met.

(e) The personal possession permit shall set forth all of the following information:

(1) The name, address, phone number, and date of birth of the permit holder;

(2) The address where the inherently dangerous animal or animals will be kept;

(3) The name, number, sex, species, age of the inherently dangerous animal or animals, and any distinguishing marks or coloration that would aid in the identification of the animals;

(4) The identification number required under G.S. 19A‑75, if applicable;

(5) The name, address, and phone number of the veterinarian who provides veterinary care to the inherently dangerous animal or animals named on the permit; and

(6) Any other relevant information the Department may deem necessary.

(f) If a person can no longer care for an inherently dangerous animal, that person may only transfer the animal to another person currently holding a valid personal possession permit.

(g) The Department shall keep records of persons carrying a valid permit. A permit holder shall notify the Department of any changes in the stated information on the permit, including the death of an inherently dangerous animal.

"§ 19A‑75. Identification number.

Every inherently dangerous animal shall be implanted with a microchip, at the expense of the possessor, by or under the supervision of a veterinarian. This provision does not apply if a veterinarian determines that the implant of a microchip would endanger the well‑being of the animal.

"§ 19A‑76. Spaying or neutering.

Every inherently dangerous animal must be spayed or neutered, at the expense of the possessor, by or under the supervision of a veterinarian. This provision does not apply if a veterinarian determines that the spay or neuter procedure would endanger the well‑being of the animal.

"§ 19A‑77. Caging requirements and standards for inherently dangerous animals.

For each inherently dangerous animal, the possessor shall comply with the American Zoo and Aquarium Association's (AZA's) Minimum Husbandry Guidelines for animal care and maintenance of that animal.

"§ 19A‑78. Care and treatment of inherently dangerous animals.

(a) An inherently dangerous animal shall not be tethered, leashed, chained outdoors, or allowed to run at large.

(b) An inherently dangerous animal shall not be mistreated, neglected, abandoned, deprived of necessary food, water, and sustenance, or otherwise treated in a manner that violates Article 47 of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes.

© A possessor transporting an inherently dangerous animal in a vehicle shall keep the animal securely caged in the vehicle at all times.

(d) Each possessor shall have a plan for the quick and safe recapture of the inherently dangerous animal if the animal escapes, and a plan for the destruction of the animal if recapture is impossible.

(e) The possessor shall contact the Department, a wildlife sanctuary, or an American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA) accredited facility if the possessor can no longer care for the inherently dangerous animal prior to euthanasia of the inherently dangerous animal, and shall do so before resorting to euthanasia.

"§ 19A‑79. Insurance; signs; notification.

(a) The possessor of an inherently dangerous animal shall maintain liability insurance coverage in an amount of not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for each occurrence for liability damages for destruction of or damage to property, and for death or bodily injury to a person caused by the inherently dangerous animal. The possessor of an inherently dangerous animal shall provide a copy of the policy for liability insurance to the Department on an annual basis.

(b) The possessor of an inherently dangerous animal shall have continuously posted and displayed, at each possible entrance onto the premises where an inherently dangerous animal is kept, a conspicuous sign, clearly legible, and easily readable by the public, warning that there is an inherently dangerous animal on the premises. The Department may prescribe the exact content and size of the sign.

© No person may intentionally release an inherently dangerous animal.

(d) If any inherently dangerous animal escapes, either intentionally or unintentionally, the possessor of the animal shall immediately contact the Department and the animal control authority or a law enforcement officer of the city or county in which the possessor resides to report the escape or release.

(e) If an inherently dangerous animal escapes or is intentionally released, the possessor is liable for all reasonable expenses associated with efforts to recapture the animal, unless the escape is due to the criminal act of another person. If the inherently dangerous animal cannot be recaptured safely by the Department, animal control authority, or law enforcement officer, or if proper and safe housing cannot be found, the Department may immediately euthanize the animal.

"§ 19A‑80. Public contact.

Unless prior approval has been received from the Department, a person shall not bring an inherently dangerous animal to any public property or commercial or retail establishment unless the person is bringing the animal to a licensed veterinarian or a veterinarian clinic.

"§ 19A‑81. Enforcement of Article.

The provisions of this Article are enforceable by the Department, its staff, its agents, animal control authorities, local law enforcement agents, and county sheriffs.

"§ 19A‑82. Inspection.

The possessor of an inherently dangerous animal shall, at all reasonable times, allow the Department, its staff, and its agents to enter the premises where the animal is kept to ensure compliance with this Article.

"§ 19A‑83. Denial of personal possession permit; appeal.

(a) If the Department finds that an applicant for an original or renewal of a personal possession permit does not meet the requirements set forth in G.S. 19A‑74, the Department shall deny the applicant a personal possession permit and give the applicant written notice of the denial and the reasons for the denial.

(b) If the Department finds that a person has not complied with this Article, the Department may suspend or revoke the personal possession permit and give the possessor written notice of the suspension or revocation and the reasons for the suspension or revocation.

© A person who is denied a personal possession permit, who is denied a renewal of a personal possession permit, or who has had a permit suspended or revoked, may appeal the decision to the district court for the district in which the animal is located no later than 15 days after the permit is denied, suspended, or revoked. The decision of the court may not be appealed.

"§ 19A‑84. Confiscation and disposition of inherently dangerous animals.

(a) The Department may immediately confiscate any inherently dangerous animal if the animal is kept in violation of this Article. The possessor is liable for the costs of placement and care for the inherently dangerous animal from the time of confiscation until the time of return to the possessor, or until the time the animal has been relocated to an approved facility, such as a wildlife sanctuary or an institution accredited by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA).

(b) If an inherently dangerous animal is confiscated as a result of the animal being kept in violation of this Article, the possessor shall post a security bond or cash with the Department in an amount sufficient to guarantee payment of all reasonable expenses expected to be incurred in capturing, caring for, providing for, and placing the animal, including the estimated cost of feeding, medical care, and housing for at least 30 days, plus the cost of relocating the animal. The security bond or cash shall not prevent the Department from disposing of the animal at the end of the 30 days unless the person claiming the animal posts an additional security bond or cash with the Department to secure payment of all reasonable expenses expected to be incurred in caring and providing for the animal for an additional 30 days, and does so prior to the expiration of the first 30‑day period. The amount of the security bond or cash shall be determined by the Department and based on the current rate to feed, provide medical care, and house the animal, plus the cost of relocating the animal and costs already incurred for capturing and relocating the animal.

© If the possessor of a confiscated animal cannot be located, or if a confiscated animal remains unclaimed, the Department may, in its discretion, contact an approved facility, such as a wildlife sanctuary or an institution accredited by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA), allow the animal to be adopted by a person who currently possesses a personal possession permit, or euthanize the animal.

(d) If the inherently dangerous animal cannot be taken up or recaptured safely by the Department, or if proper and safe housing cannot be found, the Department may immediately euthanize the animal.

(e) An inherently dangerous animal may be returned to the possessor only if, to the satisfaction of the Department, the possessor has a personal possession permit, has corrected the conditions resulting in the confiscation, and has paid the cost of placement and care of the animal while under the care and control of the Department.

"§ 19A‑85. Penalties.

(a) Any possessor who fails to obtain a personal possession permit under G.S. 19A‑74 for an inherently dangerous animal or renew a personal possession permit for each inherently dangerous animal shall be liable for a civil penalty of not less than two hundred dollars ($200.00) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each animal with respect to which there is a violation and for each day the violation continues. A civil penalty collected pursuant to this subsection may be retained by the Department.

(b) A person who violates the provisions of G.S. 19A‑74(f), 19A‑75, 19A‑77, 19A‑79(b), 19A‑79(d), 19A‑80, or 19A‑82 is guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.

© A person who violates G.S. 19A‑73(b), 19A‑76, 19A‑78, 19A‑79(a), 19A‑79©, or 19A‑84(b) is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.

"§ 19A‑86. Local governing bodies.

Pursuant to its authority under G.S. 153A‑131 andG.S. 160A‑187, a city or county may adopt an ordinance governing inherently dangerous animals that is more restrictive than this Article. Such an ordinance may apply to animals not covered by this Article, provide additional caging standards, provide stricter care and treatment standards, or otherwise restrict or prohibit the possession of inherently dangerous animals.

"§ 19A‑87. Severability.

If any part of this act is found to be unconstitutional or unenforceable, it shall not affect the constitutionality or enforceability of any other part."

SECTION 2. This act becomes effective January 1, 2006, and applies to inherently dangerous animals existing in this State on or after that date. A person who meets the legal requirements for possessing an inherently dangerous animal set forth in Article 6 of Chapter 19A of the General Statutes, as enacted in this act, is not required to obtain a personal possession permit by that date, but shall obtain that permit by March 31, 2006. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall implement and administer the provisions of Article 6 of Chapter 19A of the General Statutes, and shall establish the fee authorized by that Article and the personal possession permit program necessary to implement the provisions of that Article no later than January 1, 2006.
 
Well, gosh...that's a lot of mumbo jumbo. Why or how anyone could keep a rhinocerous or elephant...I don't know.

but kikajous? I knew some people who had one, they were missionaries in south america, I believe, and they brought one home with them. It was a sweet animal. They eat fruit and vegetables.... April
 
They don't want people keeping cobras?!? Next thing you know, those ultra-liberal North Carolina politicians will be wanting to fluoridate the water. Communists.
 
Yeah, I was really upset to find out I couldn't have a boomslang.
 
Too much legalese to actually read.  Too much legalese to make sense of.  I live in a 100-acre wood with a 3-acre lake.  I encourage the deadly and o-so-ferocious owls, bats, turkey vultures, snakes, scorpions, beaver, deer, and occassional coyote to come visit.  I have a rescue parrot I renamed FrankenBird who routinely draws blood; 5 rescue turtles who would just as soon bite as cuddle; 4 large (nearly as heavy as my 114 lbs) rescue dogs who, because of their history, are not as sweet and docile as the general public would like ...and oh yeah, plants that I encourage to eat bugs.   And now NC says I can't take in that errant hyena, rhino or crazed chimp??  Geeze, what is it with these ridiculous laws?      
smile.gif
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (LunaC @ April 17 2005,4:14)]And now NC says I can't take in that errant hyena, rhino or crazed chimp??
...which I would say is *slightly* more dangerous than a vampire parrot or a few dogs. How you would keep a Rhino from going on a rampage if it wants to?
confused.gif


Ozzy I could have sworn that this was another late (or early) AF joke. See what your jokes have done to me....
smile_m_32.gif
Ok firstly, I will say that I would be completely freaked out if my neighbour had a Rhino staring at me everytime I came out to water my plants, and still would be if there was a 4 foot high stone wall and electric fencing between us. Personally I would certainly vouch for a law like that, but that may just be becuz I come from singapore where the most *dangerous* "animal" happens to be a few weedy looking ministers from the government.

However from the Rhino lover's point of view maybe it would be fair to give him the choice, but the responsibitlity as well. Something like this: If the Rhino hurts/kills/massacres anyone then you WILL go to jail and have to pay a fine of $$$$$ dollars. Then they'll be waling on eggs, and have to decide between they're love for Rhinos and whether thye are willing to take the risk or not. Plus I'm sure the Rhino would have much space to roam since no one would be living next to the guy anyway.
smile.gif
 
This list puts most of zoological imports' products on the 'S' list...

From a conservation and safety standpoint I see the point to some of these animals being listed. An elephant or rhino is not a pet, if I were in charge not even circuses would be allowed to have em... especially circuses! And zoos would have to proove some mighty good conditions to get my stamp, the zoos around here are completely disgusting.

There are a few inclusions which do seem a bit odd. Like the kinkajous and large snakes. (I can see the point of including the posionous ones who are quick biters) but other than being a nuisance upon escaping I don't think any 12 foot pythons have crawled into too many nursing homes and ate old ladies. My science teacher had a 8 foot python living in our class all through my time in highschool.

No Kangaroos? There was a 'roo farm in Wisconsin a few years back (ok, maybe a decade) and some 6 year old kid stole his dads car and drove through the fence of the farm... setting about 50 kangaroos loose in wisconsin - that was funny to see them hopping down the road! I didn't think they were dangerous though, just hard to catch!
smile_n_32.gif
 
I didn't want to post my opinion yet until I heard what some others thought. I wanted to hear some true opinions.
I mostly agree with Swords. Nobody needs a pet elephant, rhinoceroses, chimpanzees, gorillas and so on. Some others make good pets but I think that there should be some control on Lions, Tigers, and other animals that can pose a threat to the public and some that require special housing. But some are about as stupid as a recent Aprils fools joke somebody tried to pull a while back.

Gambian rats
kinkajous
coatis
lemurs,
monkeys
prairie dogs
water monitors
Family Boidae – all species whose adult length has the potential to exceed eight feet in length.
beaded lizards
Gila monsters
alligators
caimans

These are legitimate pets and pose little threat to the public.
I think that since unusual pets are more popular now the politicians have figured out another way to line their pockets.

Under this law, If you have a pet lemur, you have to have at least $100,000 liablity insurance. You also have to post a sign on your door warning people of the dangerous lemur. If your lemur escape you have to call animal control and have a plan to to kill the it to keep it from injuring the public.
 
I know that the bill is a little long, so I'll condense it for the ones that don't want to read the whole thing.

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT providing for the Protection of the public against the health and safety risks that Inherently Dangerous Animals pose and to protect the welfare of inherently dangerous animals.

(a) It is the intent of the General Assembly to protect the public against health and safety risks that inherently dangerous animals pose to the community and to protect the welfare of the individual animals held in private possession and at roadside zoos. The General Assembly finds that by their very nature these animals are wild and inherently dangerous and do not adjust well in captivity without sufficient provisions for animal welfare and professional animal care expertise.

(b) The General Assembly finds that inherently dangerous animals are extremely unpredictable and dangerous creatures; the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of United States Department of Agriculture (USDA/APHIS), the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA), the American Veterinary Medical Association, and numerous animal welfare and public safety organizations believe that only properly trained professionals and certified institutions should keep these animals.

© The General Assembly finds that care and handling of these inherently dangerous animals should be left to those qualified individuals who have the knowledge and means to maintain them properly; the average owner of an inherently dangerous animal lacks the specialized equipment and expertise necessary to provide properly for the containment, medical care, husbandry, and nutrition of a wild animal, and it is virtually impossible for an inherently dangerous animal to adapt to traditional household settings or inadequate living spaces and conditions.

1.) Class Mammalia

a. Order Carnivora

1. Family Felidae (lions, tigers, leopards, ocelots, servals, etc.) – all species except domestic cats.

2. Family Canidae (wolves, foxes, jackals, etc.) – all species except domestic dogs and indigenous foxes.

3. Family Ursidae (bears) – all species except black bears.

4. Family Viverridae (only binturongs).

5. Family Procyonidae (only kinkajous and coatis).

6. Family Hyaenidae (hyenas, etc.) – all species.

b. Order Marsupialia – only kangaroos.

c. Order Perissodactyla – only rhinoceroses.

d. Order Primates (lemurs, monkeys, chimpanzees, gorillas) – all species.

e. Order Proboscidae (elephants, etc.) – all species.

f. Order Rodentia – only prairie dogs and Gambian rats.

(2) Class Reptilia

a. Order Squamata

1. Family Varanidae – only water monitors and crocodile monitors.

2. Family Boidae – all species whose adult length has the potential to exceed eight feet in length.

3. Family Colubridae – only boomslangs and African twig snakes.

4. Family Elapidae (cobras, mambas, etc.) – all species.

5. Family Nactricidae – only keelback snakes.

6. Family Viperidae (vipers) – only nonindigenous species.

7. Family Helodermatidae (beaded lizards, Gila monsters, etc.) – all species.

8. Family Hydrophiidae (sea snakes, etc.) – all species.

9. Family Atractaspidae (mole vipers, etc.) – all species.

b. Order Crocodilia (crocodiles, alligators, caimans, gavials, etc.) – all species.

Every inherently dangerous animal shall be implanted with a microchip, at the expense of the possessor, by or under the supervision of a veterinarian. This provision does not apply if a veterinarian determines that the implant of a microchip would endanger the well‑being of the animal.

Every inherently dangerous animal must be spayed or neutered, at the expense of the possessor, by or under the supervision of a veterinarian. This provision does not apply if a veterinarian determines that the spay or neuter procedure would endanger the well‑being of the animal.

(a) The possessor of an inherently dangerous animal shall maintain liability insurance coverage in an amount of not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for each occurrence for liability damages for destruction of or damage to property, and for death or bodily injury to a person caused by the inherently dangerous animal. The possessor of an inherently dangerous animal shall provide a copy of the policy for liability insurance to the Department on an annual basis.

(b) The possessor of an inherently dangerous animal shall have continuously posted and displayed, at each possible entrance onto the premises where an inherently dangerous animal is kept, a conspicuous sign, clearly legible, and easily readable by the public, warning that there is an inherently dangerous animal on the premises. The Department may prescribe the exact content and size of the sign.

(a) Any possessor who fails to obtain a personal possession permit under G.S. 19A‑74 for an inherently dangerous animal or renew a personal possession permit for each inherently dangerous animal shall be liable for a civil penalty of not less than two hundred dollars ($200.00) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each animal with respect to which there is a violation and for each day the violation continues. A civil penalty collected pursuant to this subsection may be retained by the Department.
 
  • #10
I am amazed that the most dangerous animal of all is not included on the list.....Polititians.
 
  • #11
I don't have any interest in keep or breeding that animal. That's one animal that I hope is extict very soon.

If you think this law is crazy you should have seen the one that West Virginia tried to pass. They had almost the same law but instead of "dangerous" animals, their law targeted all exotic animals. And Exotic was defined as any animal that was not indigenous to WV.
 
  • #12
Montana is in the process of passing one. but its directed more towrds venomous snakes(only front fanged and boomslangs) and potential agricultural pests. i need a permit to bring a chinchilla into the state. kinda sucks. dont know who would turn a $60 plus critter loose when they can easily find a home for it. but anyone can buy one from a breeder in state. however on the snake issue. i think there should be a licencing system where you have to show you can keep lethally venomous snakes in fairly safe conditions(ie, only a potential hazard to the keeper not to the general public) which is actually fairly straight forward. seperate room, lockable windows, screen on any heating/AC vents, special considerations for doors ect. it could be done with an afternoons work. unfortunatly the "governing officials" dont see it my way. THANK GOD they didnt go into the Boid thing. how would you enforce it? Boa constrictor imperator can get anywayer from 4-9 feet depending on what locale. ones from the Sonoran desert max out at 4 or 5 feet. ones from Panama/Columbia can get pretty big and these are all the same subspecies.
 
  • #13
Humans do more damage then any other animal on the planet. Here we are talking about dangerous animals.
laugh.gif
 
  • #14
I know here in Virginia, they are trying to pass a "dangerous animal" law. Just recently in the space of about a week, an older lady was attacked and killed by a pitbull and in another case the family dog attacked and killed the family's little boy. (Although in the latter case, it turns out the family kept the dog chained all the time. No wonder the animal went berzerk...)

So now they are trying to figure out some kind of registry sort of like the sex offender registry. I really don't know if something like that can be any good. Knowing WHERE a dangerous animal (or person) is located in no way means either will not offend. So you know someone down the street has a pitbull known to bite. What do I do? Stay in my house all the time just in case the dog might be loose?

The better thing would be to make sure that anyone who keep an exotic pet (which I don't agree with) or has a dog who's breeding was for the purpose of aggression, to learn how to handle their pets! Dog's with aggressive ancestry and wild animals can be trained and tamed...but you NEVER can erase what their genetics tells them to do. Too many people think their pit bulls are "sweet and friendly" and therefore don't take their training seriously. There is a BIG difference between temperament and breeding. You can have a seriously dangerous dog who has a nice temperament.

My little demon Ollie is sweet tempered and friendly but I always have to bear in mind his breed was built to chase and catch small furry things and shake them to death.
 
  • #15
All I know is that dogs should be chained up. I love running and hate having to flee dogs in the process. My neighbor had a rottweiler and sometimes would run around free. Then after I have lived in my home for a two years dealing with the dog, I saw cops over at the house. Since that day *well they moved since then* I never saw the dog.
 
  • #16
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]anyone who keep an exotic pet (which I don't agree with)


PAK, out of curiousity, what do you consider an exotic pet? i know my definition is different than most as ive been keeping "exotic" snakes for years. im now starting to get into dart frogs which for most fall under the "exotic" heading. i keep chinchillas and degus which are from Chile. my definition of "exotic" i guess leans twords the so called "super exotics" which would be the large hoof stock(zebras, antelope ect) and large cats and stuff. i guess personally as long as a person can properly care for the animal and is able to keep the "general public" safe i say why not let them keep the animal?
 
  • #17
BTW some of the absolute sweetest dogs ive known inclde 3 or 4 rottwielers, a couple of dobermans and one wonderful pitbull that my brother had. how a dog is raised and cared for has a big influence on how it turns out.
 
  • #18
Does not bother me if you have snakes, dart frogs, or any other animals as long as they are contained, and I do not find them in my yard or house.
 
  • #19
I consider "exotic" things like elephants, lions, tigers, zebras...things like that.  Animals that your average person can't really care for properly.  There are some people who have large "preserves" and the money it takes to provide for those types of animals but they are best left out in the wild in their native environment.

[b said:
Quote[/b] ]BTW some of the absolute sweetest dogs ive known inclde 3 or 4 rottwielers, a couple of dobermans and one wonderful pitbull that my brother had. how a dog is raised and cared for has a big influence on how it turns out.

I absolutely agree.  But that is my point exactly.  Some people rely TOTALLY on how they raised the dog and think because the dog's *temperament* is "sweet", its harmless and that is not ALWAYS true.  Again...you're talking temperament vs. breeding.  You STILL have to bear in mind what a dog was bred for...as their genetic make-up will always be a factor in the dog's behavior.

And don't get me wrong.  I'm not picking on pitbulls, rotties, dobies or other dogs bred for protection or fighting.  I know they can be good family pets.  But you GOTTA be aware of what they were bred for.  You can't compare a pitbull to a short-haired pointer or a retriever as a pet.  Pointers were never bred to attack anything.  So the likelihood of a dog attack by a pointer is lot less than with a pitbull.

My dog Ollie has a sweet temperament but I'll always have to be watchful of him around small furry animals like cats or very small dogs.  Every fiber of his being tells him to chase and kill.  That's what fox terriers were bred for.  That doesn't mean Ollie is a mean dog.  He would be doing what his genes tell him to do.  Also if any dog shows aggression towards him, he WILL fight back as terriers were bred to face and fight fierce "vermin" like badgers and foxes and ***not to back down***!  So while I certainly don't have to worry every second that Ollie is going to attack something furry...lol... I am simply careful when he is around other animals to keep an eye on him.
 
  • #20
If you non-herpetophiles want to get a chill, go to kingsnake.com and look at the venomous listings in the classifieds.
 
Back
Top