I hope that I'm wrong but as I watch my plants grow (2 'sold-as' U. quelchii, 2 'real' U. quelchii, U. tricolor & other U. foliosa), it is getting harder to avoid the conclusion that the plants in question are indeed tricolor & not U. quelchii ...
- while the leaf shape is not definitive, none of the pics (or my plants) appear identical to young U. quelchii & none have shown the characteristic thick leaf found in typical U. quelchii (incl Av's) pics
- both of my imitators are growing faster than any other Orchidioides / Iperua in my collection.
- close-up pics of the traps seem to be definitive for a tricolor ID
- the ebay seller is using a pic of U. quelchii that is unrelated to the plants he is selling. DD procured his plants from this person & neither have seen adult leaves or blooms. (are both statements true?)
- Nicole states that she is 90% certain of a U. tricolor identification
- Section foliosa utrics are
notoriously invasive ... (which provides a possible explanation - assuming that the
potential mis-identification was not deliberate)
- U. tricolor has significant variability in leaf shape. Some U. tricolor 'escaped' into the bottom of my 'little weed utric tank' a while ago. I keep relocating other pots to keep them away from possible infiltration (I really need to strip the tank...). Here are some examples of the non-typical leaves (in the 4th pic - also notice the thin leaf resting on a typical - bottom right):
------------------------------------------ Later edit...
On a somewhat related (& ironic) note, I just received an order of somewhat-difficult-to-find-in-USA Utrics from Europe and what shape are the immature U. geminiloba leaves? Yup ...