[b said:
Quote[/b] (Tony Paroubek @ Mar. 20 2004,16:17)]Doesn't look like pure S. leucophylla
I agree with Trent..... S. leucophylla hybrid
Tony
Nope, it's pure and it's probubly "Tarnok". Why do you think it is a hybred? Have you ever seen Schnells book? That species is really variable, and the top starts out green and turns white as it ages and in accordence to light levels
That and I went and looked up the list of plants found it that grab bag sale:
purpurea
rubra
Judith Hindle
leucophylla Tarnok
leucophylla (maybe or maybe not, I'm not sure on this one)
RED leucophylla
wrigleyana
So unless that is one very strait, tall, open pitcherd wrigleyana, it's Leucophylla
Oh yah and I have plants from the same sale that I just fineshed doing a formal IDing via the measurments and all that other fun stuff on mine. The only peice of the puzzle missing is the flower, but they should all be Tarnok unless some normals got mixed in. Yah big buff double gened plant
I admit the bulge is a little funny, but several of the red veined wild populations have this and are still consitterd by most to be pure Lecophylla, those that actually have purp ansesstory start to show it a bit more. Not to mention, if it is Tarnok that would make sence because extra DNA could have caused more funnies then just a double petalled flower.