We need to find a good balance for regions..
for example, having each state be its own region is obviously too many regions..
we would need to find a "regional head grower" for each of the 50 states..
thats totally unreasonable.
on the flip side, dividing up the USA into say, 4 regions, north, south, east west, is too few regions, and each "RHG" would have far too many people to keep track of..
so we need something in between.
Perhaps something like this:
(this is just a
very rough draft..off the top of my head..open to debate and changes!
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/4053/nascregiondraft3tc.gif
you also have to factor in population density..
for example, the "North East region" looks much smaller than the "plains region" in terms of area..and it is.
but more people live in he NE region than the plains region..
so the regions would also need to be balanced out in terms of number of NASC members in each region..
Scot