Apologies if this goes a little off topic, but I have to agree with Swords. some of these restrictions do little more than romanticize and popularize the plants, at the same time interfering with their legitimate dispersal. I could get 50 S. oreophila rhizomes tomorrow to redistribute, from nursery grown stock (the grower has no more room for them, he cannot sell enough of them, and he cannot give them away since he is a commercial dealer, who would believe they were for free?) So, I am prohibited by law and discouraged by the paperwork. Sure, I could cheat and do it anyways, which is just my point. Many do. I feel C.I.T.E.S. legislation does as much harm as it does good. It certainly does little to curtail field collection.
Regarding legal issues of possessing these plants, it has been suggested by Dr. Barry Meyers that accurate records be kept of the source of your plants, preferably with a legal bill of sale appended to the record. This also applies to the white flowered form of P. ionatha, also cites protected. Sheesh. I am sure there is a veritable army of plant cops out there with snooperscopes methodically looking into everyones collections, and they have dossiers on us all.....
Meanwhile, shipments are being seized of tens of thousands of mature wild harvested VFT bulbs! It sure sounds like something isn't working here, or am I missing something?
You can't dig them up, but it's fine to plow them under. These plants had no business evolving on future golf courses.
By the way, if you do want to ship a S. oreophila, simply do so with a label marked "un-named Sarracenia Hybrid", but kindly do not disturb any native populations. In fact, don't even seek them out to look at them. Footprints alter drainage patterns. Stay away and let them live or die now in peace, in the sliver of reality that is left to them.
Sorry, there I go again.