</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">We are currently working together to produce a reliable photographic reference for these plants.[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Tamlin,
I'm looking forward to this.
I think I messed on labelling between the D. puchella gemmae and D. pygmaea "ESA". Also (if they're) D. pygmaea, they appear bigger than the D. "C-1" (if these are alos labelled correctly.
I'm just surprised that D. pygmaea isn't the smaller out of the two.
Tamlin,
I'm looking forward to this.
I think I messed on labelling between the D. puchella gemmae and D. pygmaea "ESA". Also (if they're) D. pygmaea, they appear bigger than the D. "C-1" (if these are alos labelled correctly.
I'm just surprised that D. pygmaea isn't the smaller out of the two.