Im sure it will. The thing is though the reason the 'robcantleyi' became hot in the beginning was because someone (I will not name them) claimed that this was just so BE could make more money (or something like that).
I disagree. If you read the thread properly the whole issue is the fact that the species was described by a single plant in cultivation instead of a population of wild plants and the fact that there are discrepancies with the official story about the origin of that single plant based on the discoverer, Rob Cantley posting years ago he had the seed sent to him mixed with truncata seeds which only allows them to be named as cultivars.
Also much of the controversy is that Robs competitor is taking advantage of this issue to attack Borneo exotics in the name of the integrity of the genus.
No such thing would happen with hairy hamata. There is a Wild population which can be used to describe the species and there are no discrepancies or hidden facts besides the location of hairy hamata.