User Tag List

Informational! Informational!:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 8 of 9

Thread: Hamata vs Macrophylla

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Hamata vs Macrophylla

    Hi All.

    I am thinking of getting one of the above and want to get as much first hand experience as possible.

    In a relative context which is easier Hamata or Macrophylla?

    I will ensure that I am able to meet the temperature and humidity requirements.

    From what I habe read so far it seems Hamata becomes somewhat more forgiving once it gets larger.

  2. #2
    Toothy Connoisseur vdub804's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    105
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Man do yourself a favor and get both!!! Hl neps are like lays potato chips, you can't have just one they both grow well if provided good conditions even so Macrophylla is the slow grower of the two.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so true so true. Are there any clones that are more preferrable to others? (hamata red hairy is way out of the affordability range)

  4. #4
    Tastes like chicken! Exo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Albion, NY
    Posts
    2,895
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hamata appears to be easier and faster growing, and is usually more afforable. Wistuba's kataposa hamatas are particularly nice.
    Some days it just isn't worth chewing thru the restraints.

    My growlist: http://www.terraforums.com/forums/sh...255#post961255

    Video of my birth http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xc5wIpUenQ

  5. #5
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Cascadia Subduction Zone
    Posts
    2,113
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would say hamata is definitely the easiest of the two. It's not particularly slow and will grow at a comparable rate to most species; it's also typically more affordable. Macrophylla and its sister species are particularly slow and need to be approached a bit differently than most Nepenthes.

    That being said, "Once you pop, the fun don't stop!" (but I guess that's Pringles).

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks for the feedback. All this speaks to is bad case nep-I-want-a-titis, the deadly nep addition The more I research the more I want to grow different species!

  7. #7
    i dont do pots. amphirion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area, US
    Posts
    3,498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hamata is both easier in temp requirements and size management. they call it "MACROphylla" for a reason.
    " You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." -Inigo Montoya
    +growlist
    +petiolaris drosera going dormant?
    +picture thread

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Like the one on ebay?!?! one can wish for such a macro problem.

    What time span would it take to get to a problem size?

    At what levels would a macrophylla start getting into trouble? (I guess sustained temps levels is more appropriate)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •