What's new
TerraForums Venus Flytrap, Nepenthes, Drosera and more talk

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ultimate physics

  • Thread starter lol
  • Start date
  • Tags
    major

lol

BANNED
For the coasttocoast listeners on here, if ya heard tonight's show (9/20/05) with David Sereda, please talk about what you thought of his theories on physics, and the nature of light and the duality of the universe. I think his research may finally show a solid theory that finally reaches beyond the limits of our current model of physics. I like how he refers to the bible as well. I have a nack (intuition) for being able to weed out theories and information that aren't right, and his theories on duality aren't one of them. Major scientific and spiritual implications... For those who didn't hear the show, ya need to hear it. I'll see if I can find a recording of it on the net, and host it or sumthin.
 
Some of those alien topics on coast to coast make me laughMAO!! some crazy people call in every once in a while... fun to hear when falling asleep at the wheel I tell you that! But every once in a while I do hear some neat things didn't catch that show though.

-Jc
 
Didn't hear the show, but I've heard that bunk about light before. Garbage.
 
Anyone care to elucidate on the theory a bit or provide a link to some information?
 
Try looking at his website
http://ufonasa.terra-ent.com/
It's a mixture of pseudo-science, half-truths and downright lies.
Supposedly, NASA has photographic evidence of a fleet of about fifty alien craft (each between two and three miles long, and capable of faster-than-light travel) visiting Earth. Mr Sereda then ties this with Stonehenge, crop circles, the Dagon mythology about the visits of the fish-people from Sirius (sic) and the Dropa stones (which are a hoax, anyway). Oh, and these UFOs aren't visible in the part of the spectrum humans can see, which is why you didn't notice them.
Please....I don't know where to start taking this nonsense apart..
T.
 
If you want to take a dive headfirst into aliens and such i sugest reading "Behold a Pale Horse" by William "Bill" Cooper. Supposedly the government "eliminated" him because of the information he exposed. Its a fun read wether you belive whats in it or not. Theres also a pretty interesting theory about AIDS in it. It kinda makes you think twice about your government.
 
Look, I'm not even talking about the aliens. The show didn't cover aliens tonight, and I don't know if it ever did with him. Lets stick to the physics portion of his work, since that is science and worth arguing about. I believe his theory was that in our physical universe, everything works with a duality, and that duality creates resistance or wave patterns. It is from that resistance that time is formed. In the bible, Adam and Eve found the notion of good and even, and thus in themselves became seperated, and fell out of eden. That makes sense, since you'll always be at odds with yourself trying to decide what's right and what's wrong.
He said that the light wave form (I think light is the electromagnetic spectrum, you know from photons to gamma rays, not my expertise). He said that light is unique in that it can go much faster if it were not bound by time, which is defined by light always encountering resistance in our physical universe from other matter or energy. The void of space is NOT A VOID. There is a form of matter or energy in that darkness, and I've heard too much from other good souces to say otherwise. So as light hits this dark matter/energy, it innevitably slows down, and thus it takes a great amount of time for light to reach the nearest galaxy.
He mentioned that experiments have been done (and this is true, I've looked it up and heard from many others) where electrons were shot at a wall with 2 or 3 slits for the electron to pass through. Supposedly, the lectron passed through both slits (same electron, two instances). Although scientists can't figure this out, he suspected that it was because all possibilities, past and present really exist at the same time, but we can only experience one at a time. I don't know how this works, but he has also mentioned experiments where loan electrons not orbiting any atoms have disapeard in mass and transformed into light. Jesus was quoted in the bible as saying "when I am one, my body shall become that of light" or something like that.
Last thing is the cingularity (black hole stuff). I knew since I was ten reading about black holes that the cingularity, that infinately small point, must be the gateway to some higher state of reality. Was always my theory. When Jesus said "when I am one", he may have been refering to the duality of the world we live in (protons, anti protons, electrons, anti-electrons, male and female, right and wrong). Because we live in this duality, spiritualy and physically, we are unable to acend to higher forms of energy. We are not beings of light, as are the angels. In the nature of the cingularity, everything exists at the same time, all time and all space. My brain is fried so I'll go in depth later. For those who wish to debunk any of this, please bring your evidence to the table instead of mouthing off, and I'll bring my evidence. Thank you, and lets keep it clean
smile.gif
.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (lol @ Sep. 21 2005,2:54)] Jesus was quoted in the bible as saying "when I am one, my body shall become that of light"  or something like that.  
When Jesus said "when I am one", he may have been refering to the duality of the world we live in (protons, anti protons, electrons, anti-electrons, male and female, right and wrong).
Just a quick question: Where did He say that? It just doesn't sound familiar. Also, Biblically speaking, God doesn't have a counterpart. He refers to himself as being One. It isn't satan, because satan is an angelic being. Although the Bible does NOT use the word Trinity, the concept of it comes from the use of the phrase, "Father, Son, and Holy Spirit." The Bible does NOT teach duality. Looking for patterns in the Bible, with a set of pre-conceived ideas, making the Bible conform to those ideas, is a dangerous approach.
 
jimscott, that's the point! God has no duality, he is one. That's why he is god, a conciousness connected to all reality, and all reality beneath him. That's why Jesus said when he is one, he will become a being of light. It's similar to the nature of the cingularity, but I think the cingularity may have multiple layers to it, with god being at the top of course.
 
  • #10
Matthew 6:22-24 (New International Version)
New International Version (NIV)
Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society

   

   22"The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are good, your whole body will be full of light. 23But if your eyes are bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that darkness!

   24"No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money.

Not quite the one I was talking about, but luke has something similar

Luke 11:33-38 (New International Version)
New International Version (NIV)
Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society

   

The Lamp of the Body
   33"No one lights a lamp and puts it in a place where it will be hidden, or under a bowl. Instead he puts it on its stand, so that those who come in may see the light. 34Your eye is the lamp of your body. When your eyes are good, your whole body also is full of light. But when they are bad, your body also is full of darkness. 35See to it, then, that the light within you is not darkness. 36Therefore, if your whole body is full of light, and no part of it dark, it will be completely lighted, as when the light of a lamp shines on you."

 And there are many other verses in the bible talking about beings of light.  The first verse would seem to imply that if we are divided, then we can't be beings of light.  I'll see if I can find the verse David mentioned.

Ok, David was reffering to what jesus said to the sermon on the mount.
http://www.mountainman.com.au/jc_mount.html
The light of the body is the eye:
if therefore thine eye be single,
thy whole body shall be full of light. [22]

But if thine eye be evil,
thy whole body shall be full of darkness.
If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness,
how great is that darkness! [23]

No man can serve two masters:
for either he will hate the one, and love the other;
or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.
Ye cannot serve God and mammon. [24]
 
  • #12
I believe in a lot of things that can't be proven, but I'll be the first to say that science and metaphysics are two very different things. Science is more a study of the material world, and it deals in evidence. Metaphysics is the philosophical exploration of the reality the material world is "contained" in (and beyond), and it's developed more through philosophical exploration, information from sources beyond (whose identities are usually unverifiable, unfortunately), and in a smaller way parallels with physical evidence, like the weirdness of quantum physics (e.g. the possibility that reality doesn't actually "exist") that seems to mirror a lot of ancient beliefs. There are also a lot of subjective experiences which function as "evidence" for the people who experience them (e.g. astral projection, premonitions, etc), but objectively can't provide enough information to be treated as truly scientific evidence.

I guess in a way you could say science is objective, and metaphysics is subjective. I haven't really thought about it.

So, we aren't really talking about science here. Chances are you can discuss it philosopically, but won't find much real evidence, if any. That's important to remember, or top-down thinking will threaten to take hold as the brain tries to fill in the gaps.
 
  • #13
Okay, I know the passages. Translational differences can sometimes be confusing. The first part, as usual, Jesus draws upon everyday analogies, to teach his disciples. I cannot say that I fully understand it to explain it with confidence. However, my opinion is that He was encouraging his disciples to be clean on the inside, as well as portraying Christianity on the outside, with about as pure of motives as they possibly can be. Also, they were to subject themselves to that which would be appropriate toward that end. In other words, and in in our society, that would be like Jesus telling us to avoid pornography and other unsavory activities... AND... to replace it with reading the Bible and praying. By choosing to engage in healthier activities, our thoughts would be purer and hopefully our motives would be and what we do and say outwardly would be real and not phony.

The second part I think is related because it points out that you can't fill yourself with all kinds of worldly things and at the same time live your life for God. You create a war within yourself by doing so. Something has to give.



I'm sure someone else can explain it better than me!
 
  • #14
Glad you understand jimscott
biggrin.gif
. Aside from this, lets pray for the people in the way of hurricane Rita. Category 5, and perhaps the strongest ever.
confused.gif
 
  • #15
maybe god is the universe.
 
  • #16
[b said:
Quote[/b] (JustLikeAPill @ Sep. 21 2005,4:41)]maybe god is the universe.
That's kinda how I see it... two words for the same thing.

It's called "pantheism", if you're curious (you probably already knew). Not that labels are all that useful when it comes to belief systems.

Some of this stuff is interesting... http://www.pantheism.net/
 
  • #17
God is everything, and everything is a part of god. He is the alpha and the omega. I am beginning not to believe so much in any particular religion, because they all reach toward the same goal, the same point, but they just take different, yet similar paths there. our spiritual strength and knowledge is what matters. Strength is truth and love. Aside from that, would anyone like to comment on the physics and metaphysics that I mentioned? Theese newer discoveries could be the basis of space travel in the future.
 
  • #18
LOL, Jesus expressed the sam concept in another way, in a different setting. Basically, the religious leaders, who were clueless to spiritual reality, were getting on His case becuase He didn't ritually wash his hand before eating. This would have made him "unclean". Jesus pointed out that it wasn't the washing of hands that made anybody unclean, but what was inside. Here's the reference for it. from Mark 7:

14 And he called the people to him again, and said to them, "Hear me, all of you, and understand: 15 there is nothing outside a man which by going into him can defile him; but the things which come out of a man are what defile him." 16 * [No text] 17 And when he had entered the house, and left the people, his disciples asked him about the parable. 18 And he said to them, "Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a man from outside cannot defile him, 19 since it enters, not his heart but his stomach, and so passes on?" (Thus he declared all foods clean.) 20 And he said, "What comes out of a man is what defiles a man. 21 For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, fornication, theft, murder, adultery, 22 coveting, wickedness, deceit, licentiousness, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. 23 All these evil things come from within, and they defile a man."

And in another instance, in Matthew 23, He gets very blunt with the religious leaders for their hypocracy:

25 "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you cleanse the outside of the cup and of the plate, but inside they are full of extortion and rapacity. 26 You blind Pharisee! first cleanse the inside of the cup and of the plate, that the outside also may be clean. 27 "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. 28 So you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity

It has always been about what was in one's heart or eye or in their culture - the kidney - that is important.

Hey, I'm still waiting for dilithium crystals for space travel!
smile_m_32.gif
 
  • #19
maybe God is a metaphor.

or maybe i'm going crazy and my years of wild hedonism are catching up with me
biggrin.gif
 
  • #20
Sounds like a guy trying to back religion with science.
 
Back
Top