So Scot, whether or not Bush lied, do you think he encouraged an informed and open debate before the invasion? Or does now? As far as I'm concerned, that's what America's all about.
not looking to start an argument Bruce but on the no debate before, thats just a bad idea. let the "enemy" know your coming before the attack? we would have wound up loosing more troops than we have already. i realise there was some warning before the invasion but an open disscution drawn out for weeks before hand would be bad policy. as was stated before England, France, Germany and the US all thought he had WMD before the attack(im still not convinced there wasnt any but freely admit i have seen no proof either way). as to a debate now, i really dont have an answer for yah. maybe because its not really over yet or who knows why not.
not looking to start an argument Bruce but on the no debate before, thats just a bad idea. let the "enemy" know your coming before the attack? we would have wound up loosing more troops than we have already. i realise there was some warning before the invasion but an open disscution drawn out for weeks before hand would be bad policy. as was stated before England, France, Germany and the US all thought he had WMD before the attack(im still not convinced there wasnt any but freely admit i have seen no proof either way). as to a debate now, i really dont have an answer for yah. maybe because its not really over yet or who knows why not.