What's new

What Clone am I?

Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
1,044
Location
Raleigh, NC
So I recently received a cutting of a beautiful N. x Briggsiana from Huntington Gardens and I don't know what clone it is. They told me the plant originally came from Leo Song. Excuse the no lids. All the pitchers didn't have them because kids tore them all off. Does anyone know what clone it is based off of these pitchers? Thanks!

The tag said exactly this:
N. burkei
x Marabin
N. lowii

then to the right of that part it said

= N. x briggsiana

I believe their label is incorrect and that this plant is actually N. ventricosa x Marabin N. lowii. My reasoning for this is that N. burkei x N. lowii has never been done with the exception of once and that plant is believed to have been a colorful ventricosa.

So my question still remains... What form of N. x Briggsiana is this plant?

N. x Briggsiana by mcmcnair, on Flickr

N. x Briggsiana 2 by mcmcnair, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
3,413
Location
Boston, MA
Then, if the tag was accurate the plant would actually be N. burkei x (lowii x ventricosa) and not X briggsiana at all.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
1,044
Location
Raleigh, NC
It was formatted like this on the tag
N. burkei
x Marabin = N. x Briggsiana
N. lowii

From my understanding it was saying burkei x lowii is briggsiana and considering burkei and some forms of ventricosa are quite similar and in some circles synonomous their tag was mislabeled.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
3,413
Location
Boston, MA
N. x briggsiana = lowii x ventricosa and vice versa. N. burkei is not involved in the hybrid N. x briggsiana unless the original hybrids were were actually N. burkei x ventricosa (and vice versa) rather than N. ventricosa x lowii.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
1,044
Location
Raleigh, NC
I realize that burkei is not involved in N. x briggsiana. What I'm saying is that burkei x lowii has not been done and the only one that has is believed to actually be ventricosa x lowii. I'm saying that I am 99% sure their plant s N. x briggsiana, not N. burkei x lowii.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
3,413
Location
Boston, MA
Then, I am totally confused about this post Mason. I thought it started out with you trying to figure out what N. x briggsiana clone this plant was which you have subsequently stated isn't X briggsiana at all. Please clarify the direction of this. It would be very interesting if it could be proven that this plant was indeed N.burkei x lowii.
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2011
Messages
3,940
Did you ask the Huntington staff to elaborate on the plant's labeling? I've often seen plant tags badly misinterpreted and written incorrectly, often because the person labeling the plant is acting on vaguely remembered verbal communication, or rewriting a badly faded old tag.
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
405
I have seen this plant. I believe they have it out in the general viewing area. I think I remember from the tag it being a hybrid with brig and burkei. You should shoot Dylan an email and I'm sure he can clear things up. It's a sweet plant either way!
 
Top