I managed to find the description on my clone
<TABLE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: -15px" width=891 height=50><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; WIDTH: 54px; HEIGHT: 34px" rowSpan=2>BE-3081</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid; WIDTH: 132px; HEIGHT: 34px" rowSpan=2>Lumut, assorted clones</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid; WIDTH: 373px; HEIGHT: 34px" rowSpan=2>Dark purple striped pitcher body and purple deeply clawed peristome. Upper pitchers green with very long peristome claws. Some medium plants may display intermediate pitchers as they are strong rooted cuttings. Small size minimum diameter 5cm or 2".</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I thought I recall that all the G. Lumut plants in cultivation from the various nurseries all originated from one collection years back. There seems to be a fair bit of variability with coloration on the lower pitchers. Everything from green with blackish purple spots to more of a solid reddish color and not many spots. They all appear to turn green with the mature upper pitchers, but I can't say I have seen every clone out there in both stages. Years ago MT had a dozen clones so there are quite a few different plants floating around.
Now if you are asking what is the difference between the new seed grown plants BE is releasing from a different location and the G. Lumut.. that's a good question. So far the seedlings overall turn more red in the leaves than I have ever seen with the G. Lumut seedlings.
According to their website:
"The upper pitchers have less pronounced claws than the commonly circulated TC clones from Gng. Lumut and the lower pitchers are generally more robust (larger). Peristomes on mature plants are sometimes red"