The point I was making by commenting that nepenthes don't produce peanut butter was that nepenthes do not attract squirrels. All I was basically saying was that killing the squirrel is not required for the plant to live,
NEPENTHES DON'T NEED RODENTS TO SURVIVE. Your acting like I think animals shouldn't be killed at all. The only thing I mentioned as wrong is the squirrel and nathaniel is putting words in my mouth and over-exagerating
.
Just because I think killing a squirrel for no reason is wrong, it doesn't mean I don't like meat.
If I used your arument strategy (over-exaggeration and assumption) against you, I could easily accuse you of enjoying watching animals die.
But just because you don't find anything wrong with killing a squirrel, it doesn't mean you enjoy watching animals suffer and die.
I already said multiple times that plants do not need rodent meat to survive. But nathaniel keeps insisting his point that there was nothing wrong with feeding it the squirrel. The only examples given by you are ones that help humans survive. (humburger = food, leather = clothing... all for survival and have nothing wrong about them) But the squirrel stuff never got any feedback as to why it was 'required'.
Also you seem to have something against vegitarians. There are millions of them on this planet and they do not feel as if they are missing out on anything, they chose not to eat meat. You act as if they are missing out, but if they felt that way, they wouldn't stay vegetarians... would they!? (I thought i'd try your assumption thing
)
Could this please stop? I hate topics that turn into debates. I'm just here to talk about plants. Not to get headaches and frustration.
Joe
(Edited by Statik2426 at 2
8 am on May 27, 2002)