What's new
TerraForums Venus Flytrap, Nepenthes, Drosera and more talk

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How do i?....

  • #21
yeah Jenny!
Dont go!
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif


we are just arguing trivial nuances!
wink.gif

(well, maybe not quite "trivial",,but its not really a big deal anyway&#33
wink.gif


if you wanted to try the refrigrator method for Dormancy this year, you could get a VFT now and leave it outside until November! (bring it in at night if a heavy frost is predicted though..) (or put it in your basement window in November..)thats still a good 4-6 weeks of "growing season"!
im pretty much in the exact same climate as you (Rochester, NY) and my plants go into the fridge in late October and come out mid-February..then they stay indoors from mid-Feb until its "frost free"..usually late April or early May..then they go outside until late October again!
We get a really good season, even this far north...

So dont go away!
everyone here will still be glad to help with any questions you will ever have..

Scot
 
  • #22
My 2 cents is this:

I believe light is more important and the trigger, while you may get an unseasonably warm winter, I doubt the earth is going to change it's rotation. The problem is both are going to contribute to slowed growth. But because plants are already slowly going into dormancy, yet the temperatures are still adequate for growing, would imply that light is the trigger. Cold weather has always been related to low light, but comparing across species isn't going to help.

Somebody just needs to do a science fair project on this.

Take a couple VFTs, in cold and winter light.
Take a couple VFTs, in cold and summer light.
Take a couple VFTs, in warm and winter light.
Take a couple VFTs, in warm and winter light.

My hypothesis, is the slowed growth is from the lack of heat, but low light will also require the plant to use its reserves even if it is still growing. I guess, it comes down to your definition of dormancy I guess. Mine is the requirement for plants to use their 'reserves.' Which I believe both cold and low lights would require it to do.

Man, if I had 100 VFTs, some computer controlled timed lights, and some computer controlled heated chambers, I'd put all these 'theories' to test.
smile.gif
 
  • #23
Scott,
Ok lets see here..I thought we were talking about inducing dormancy? Many of your examples are situations of breaking dormancy.

Dormancy is more than a rate of visible growth. Cold temperatures retard growth yes. This does not mean the plant is dormant. You can take an actively growing VFT in the middle of the Summer and toss it in the fridge. It will grow slowly or not at all but it is not dormant!

Late Spring from colder temperatures. Sure cold temperatures slow down plant growth and retard the growth phase.

Forcing seeds on windowsills vs tossing outside.. Again not dormancy. Your talking about inducing germination and the conditions needed for it. Or if you will.. breaking dormancy.

Same situation for plants removed from a fridge and forced out of dormancy vs plants outdoors in a frozen bog.

Indian Summer.. Roses, dandelions etc continuing to grow and bloom longer than usual because of a warm Fall. These are examples of daylength neutral plants which will grow and flower regardless of daylength. Their growth rate again is temperature dependent. Have a look at the other plants which are not this type of plant (woody trees, shrubs etc) They will go dormant.. ie drop leaves, form winter buds etc, regardless of temperature. It is 100% dependent on daylength and will happen the same time every year.
Tony
 
  • #24
Tony,
yes I was talking about breaking dormancy, and inducing dormancy, because both are examples of why temp is important for both..and not so much photoperiod..

Roses are temp dependant but trees are light dependant?
sorry, but I cant buy that!
confused.gif


any plant native to say..Pennsylvania (just to pick a place)
Roses, dandelions, maple trees, all stop growing in the autumn due to the same cues, cooler temps and less light..
but if it stays warm a maple tree WONT still go dormant!
it also requires cooler temps to go dormant, same as the dandelion or the rose..in other words, if the temps didnt drop, the maple tree wont change color and drop its leaves and go dormant..it also needs the cool temps to trigger dormancy..
photoperiod alone isnt enough to do it..

Roses will keep growing if it is warm, but photoperiod decreases, so will dandelions..I agree with you there..
but so will EVERYTHING else! trees, shrubs, etc..

I know this for a fact..we have a local nursery that attempts to grow and sell Bonsai..(they arent very good at it)they mix tropical and "hardy" bonsai in the same indoor dispaly area..which is bad for the native trees! one winter a few years ago I went there and noticed they neglected to take a whole bunch of trees outside in the fall! it was mid-winter and Japanese maples, Trident Maples, Beech, etc, were all still in leaf and looking very sickly..
they were inside a greenhouse, not getting much artificial light..so they were getting pretty much "normal" winter light..they were just inside a tropical greenhouse with all the other houseplants! far too warm!
no dormancy came for them..too warm.
which again brings me back to:

NEED cold! light not as important!
rolleyes.gif


This whole theory (of mine) is very easy to prove..
(that temp is more important to dormancy that photoperiod)
just take one of your CPs, Sarracenia or VFT, and dont put it into dormancy with the rest..(whatever you do for dormancy, outside, garage, fridge, whatever)
instead take this one plant and put it in a bright window in your livingroom all winter! keep it a nice 68-70 degrees along with yourself!
will it go dormant??

Scot
 
  • #25
Ok these 2 posts was posted just this morning a little farther down the list. Im going to post them here as I believe they tie into the discussion here.

"Hello,

Last nov I got 3 red vfts they did great up intill june then every thing started going down hill traps started to get smaller and the plants look limp . Theres still growing new leaves but thats all they seem to be doing . The few traps dont shut any more and I never play with them to make them shut. One of the VFTS have made a flower I would have cut it off but by the time I seen it the flower was already 7 inches tall.

What im wondering is because I got them nov of 2002 and did not place them in the frig last year should I put them in right now before most people do or should I just wait ?? The plants dont look like there dieing just look weak.

When I first got them they were very strong and made really large traps . They grew super fast with the CO2 I am pumping into the tank . How can a plant go from super fast growth and really big traps to limp growth and small traps that dont shut ?? " (Blue_diamond2077- VFT forum, "time to put VFT in frig" topic)

"Last winter I had shop lights and CPF lights and my VFTS did great they turned a dark red at first .I had to take the cpf lights off in the summer 2 hot . I put the vfts in a window now ." (Blue_diamond2007- VFT forum, "Energy saving CF bulbs" topic)


OK my interpretation of those 2 posts is that these plants are #1 beginning to enter dormancy, and #2 grown indoors under artificial and natural light. Assuming that the indoor temps are "room temperature" (I dont know too many people that keep their houses in the 30's and 40's) that pretty much shoots the "temperature more important than light" theory right out of the water.
I cant speak for maple trees in Pa. (I'm not even sure that is a very good comparison) but I can tell you that the mulbury tree in my next door neighbors yard is already beginning to lose its leaves as well. Again the only difference between September 15th (today) and August 15th is daylength.

Steve
 
  • #26
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (vft guy in SJ @ Sep. 15 2003,7:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">OK my interpretation of those 2 posts is that these plants are #1 beginning to enter dormancy, and #2 grown indoors under artificial and natural light. Assuming that the indoor temps are "room temperature" (I dont know too many people that keep their houses in the 30's and 40's) that pretty much shoots the "temperature more important than light" theory right out of the water.
I cant speak for maple trees in Pa. (I'm not even sure that is a very good comparison) but I can tell you that the mulbury tree in my next door neighbors yard is already beginning to lose its leaves as well. Again the only difference between September 15th (today) and August 15th is daylength.

Steve[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
2 lone indoor VFTs does not a theory break..

those VFTs could very well be entering dormancy because they have gone a LONG time without it..
in that case, time is the trigger, not temp or photoperiod.
I never said temp is the ONLY trigger of dormancy!
so my theory is far from "blown out of the water"
those 2 VFTs are far from a reliable experiement to what does or does not trigger dormancy..

If a tree is turning color this early (at least around here..no idea about California) it means the tree is stressed somehow.
usually drought or a very hot/dry summer.
again, I never said temp is the ONLY trigger of dormancy in trees either. all I said was its the "most important"..

you are starting to get snotty/sarcastic steve.
please keep it nice.
none of this is a personal attack against you..we are just debating here..

(I dont know too many people that keep their houses in the 30's and 40's) that pretty much shoots the "temperature more important than light" theory right out of the water.)
 
  • #27
Scot your completely contradicting years and years of research by plant biologists that have proven over and over again that plant growth cycles are TRIGGERED by day length. (actually night length).. Flowering in plants, Induction of dormancy, Production of tubers and many other processes.

Because you can easily fool a plant into thinking it is now a differen't season based SOLELY on day length and it responds as it would naturally. THIS is how they get Pointsettia to flower for Valentines.. THIS is how they get easter lillies to flower for Easter. THIS is how they get christmas cactus to flower for Christmas.

I grow my VFT in the greenhouse all year long. The temperatures are actually WARMER at night during the Winter and the plants are absolutely without a doubt dormant. Summer leaves are now starting to die off and small traps with wide petioles are popping up. The greenhouse is the same temperature it has been all Summer. Sure isn't a change in temperature causing it. The only thing that has changed is daylength.

Is temperature important? SURE it is tied to the health of the plant and it's dormant state but it is not what triggers this state. A plant kept too warm after it has been triggered into dormancy by daylength will appear weak and sickly as you mention on the bonsai. The leaves were sickly looking because the plant was desperately trying to go dormant as the light signals it was receiving were telling it to do. It was not a nice lush actively growing and healthy plant as it would have if temperature was the deciding factor.

Tony
 
  • #28
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (scottychaos @ Sep. 15 2003,4:4
alien.gif
</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">you are starting to get snotty/sarcastic steve.
please keep it nice.
none of this is a personal attack against you..we are just debating here..[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Sorry..  didnt intend to come across as snotty..  maybe a little sarcastic
wink.gif
but certainly not in an offensive way. If thats the way I came across I apologize. I shall choose my words more carefully in the future. I never took any of this as any kind of personal attack. Im actually enjoying the debate here.

I agree that 2 VFTs are hardly a "theory breaker"  especially given that I have no other background on these specific plants beyond what I posted. I just posted that as another example of plants that were not triggered by temperature. My personal experience/ observation, combined with information I have gathered from other growers simply does not support the theory that "Temperature is FAR more important than photoperiod/amount of light..". Thats all I am trying to say. Bear in mind that this is all simply my theory on this subject, supported solely by my own personal observation. I could be completely off base here and just rambling on and on to eventually be proven wrong. (wouldnt be the first time..  and most likely not the last either
tounge.gif
) lol

Sorry again if I offended anyone
Steve
 
  • #29
while not actual scientific papers/experiments, it is some more personal experiences:

http://www.islandnet.com/~tmalcolm/aquacult.html

"Aquatic Utricularia love warmth! However for a variety of reasons such as algal and bacterial blooms at high temps, and dormancy, the best range would be from between 20-25°C. Below 18°C, and the plants begin developing turions. I have experimented with U. macrorhiza, and have found that temperature and not photoperiod is the key factor to turion production. My personal experiences with other temperate species suggest the same. I would think that tropical species would do poorly indeed below 18°C, and would perhaps die at 15°C."



An I hesitate to post this one, because I am firmly NOT a believer in (man-made) global warming!
but..ironically it does kinda prove my point!
rolleyes.gif

(it seems warmer average temps, from year to year, are causing trees to break dormancy earlier..for the sake of this thread, we will ignore the topic of WHY global temps are increasing!
wink.gif
 totally different topic!
but..regardless of the reason, its obvious that warmer temps earlier in Spring = earlier dormancy break and flowering..photoperiod is unchanged.
has to be ONLY the temp doing it! the photoperiod CANT change!

http://www.audubonnaturalist.org/feat0600.htm

and more:

http://www.blythe.org/nytrans...._Plants



Ah! here is some good info..
this says photoperiod is more important when *entering* dormancy..and warmer temps are more important when breaking dormancy:

"DAYLENGTH
The main environmental signal which triggers the onset of dormancy is daylength.  For most temperate woody plants, long days promote vegetative growth and  short days trigger dormancy.  As days begin to get shorter in later summer growth slows, and eventually a dormant bud develops.  You may recall from an earlier biology class that it is actually the length of the night that is critical, not the length of the day.  Short nights stimulate growth, long, uninterrupted nights stimulate dormancy. Daylength of course is a very reliable environmental signal since it is perfectly stable from year to year and trees will not be tricked into growing longer because of an abnormally warm fall. Daylength then is the primary trigger that results in the changes in growth regulator production which in turn results in dormancy development.  The growth regulator abscisic acid (ABA) apparently plays a role in dormancy development and has been found to build up to high levels in the fall.

INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE
Decreasing temperatures also play a role in dormancy development.  Short days cause the plant to enter pre-dormancy (and maybe even true-dormancy).  It is believed by some researchers that cool temperatures are needed for the plant to enter true-dormancy.  Whatever the specific case, dormancy in many temperate woody plants develops more quickly when  short days occur in combination with cool temperatures.

INFLUENCE OF WATER AND NUTRITION
Both water supply and mineral nutrition also interact with dormancy induction.  Water stress will deepen dormancy and if severe enough will result in a resting bud and defoliation in some trees.  High mineral nutrition can result in delaying dormancy.  This is particularly true with the mineral nitrogen.  High levels of nitrogen should never be given to plants in late summer or early fall since they may actually flush and resume growth.  For the deepest dormancy, nurserymen will reduce day length, reduce temperatures, cut back on fertilization and mildly water stress plants.

RELEASE FROM DORMANCY

RELEASE FROM DORMANCY
Temperate woody plants once in true-dormancy require chilling to enter post-dormancy.  Temperatures above freezing and in the range of 2° to 4° C are considered best.  The amount of accumulated hours at these temperatures varies but is typically between 500 and 2,000 hours.  Often species or seed sources form more northern climates require more hours but this is not a perfect rule. Fruit growers and nursery managers will often keep track of these so called chilling hours so they know when their trees have entered post-dormancy.

RELEASE FROM DORMANCY
Some researchers believe that during short days in the fall ABA builds up to high levels and induces dormancy.  Chilling may be responsible for the breaking down of ABA.  Until enough hours have accumulated to remove the inhibitory effect of ABA the plant will not break bud.  At the same time when the soil begins to warm promoters of growth such as gibberellin and cytokinins build up signaling the bud to resume growth.

RELEASE FROM DORMANCY
Once adequate chilling has occurred and the plant is in a post-dormant condition, warm temperatures and increasing day lengths are required for normal shoot expansion.  Warm temperatures are probably the most critical environmental factor at this point.  Trees of the same species growing in the north will break bud later than the ones growing in the south.  However, research has also shown that plants kept under warm temperatures but short day lengths broke bud later than plants kept in warm temperatures and long daylengths."

http://www.cnr.vt.edu/dendro/forestbiology/htmltext/chapter6.htm

So what does all this say? we need BOTH!
rolleyes.gif
 well..we knew that already.
well..it also says that photoperiod *triggers* dormancy..and cold temps *keep* dormancy..which makes sense..
all plants go into dormancy very slowly..over a period of 2 or 3 months..so you need that photoperiod to begin the process, then cold completes the cycle and the plant enters true dormancy..short photoperiod without following cold wont be true dormancy..(the indoor bonsai..they night have started to think about dormancy, but didnt get the conditions necessary to complete the job..)
and conversly, just instant cold without long preparation (photoperiod and coolere temps) also wouldnt work..(like instantly sticking your VFT into the fridge in July&#33
wink.gif


so..to KEEP and hold a true dormancy, once the process has begun, you need to maintain the cold temps..(bringing us back to mid 40's for the VFT&#33
wink.gif

to *trigger* dormancy in the first place, you need decreased photoperiod..(and cooler temps? probably..)
which bring us (well..me anyway) full circle..
give Cps a good natural cool crisp autumn, keep them outdoors straight through late October, so they naturally, slowly, go dormant..then..once its TOO cold for them outdoors (if you live in the north) bring them indoors, and KEEP them cold all winter!
(45 degrees average!
wink.gif
)

*whew*..
biggrin.gif
 
wink.gif
 
confused.gif
 
rolleyes.gif
 
  • #30
wow.gif
3--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tony Paroubek @ Sep. 15 2003,8
wow.gif
3)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Is temperature important?  SURE it is tied to the health of the plant and it's dormant state but it is not what triggers this state.  A plant kept too warm after it has been triggered into dormancy by daylength will appear weak and sickly as you mention on the bonsai.  The leaves were sickly looking because the plant was desperately trying to go dormant as the light signals it was receiving were telling it to do.  It was not a nice lush actively growing and healthy plant as it would have if temperature was the deciding factor.

Tony[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Tony,
I totally agree with that analysis of the Bonsai..
they were *trying* to go dormant! the photoperiod told them it was time to go dormant..but the air stayed too warm! so the "dormancy cycle" didnt complete, and the plants didnt enter true dormancy at all..kinda like being really tired, and WANTING to fall asleep, but not being able to do it!

"It was not a nice lush actively growing and healthy plant as it would have if temperature was the deciding factor."

but temperature WAS the deciding factor!
it was temperature alone that prevented the trees from going dormant..they needed cool/cold temps to go dormant, they didnt recieve those temps, and because of that *alone* they couldnt go dormant..
that makes temp the only deciding factor in *completing* dormancy..maybe not *triggering* dormancy..but without the cold temps, you get no dormancy at all!

I think we are both right, we just arent talking about exactly the same thing!
rolleyes.gif


Scot
 
  • #32
Scot I think you got it all there in a nutshell!

With such a large amount of diversity in the plant kingdom there are also bound to be exceptions to every rule.

T
 
  • #33
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (scottychaos @ Sep. 15 2003,5:54)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I think we are both right, we just arent talking about exactly the same thing!
<!--emo&
rolleyes.gif


Scot[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
I agree
smile.gif


Steve

edit: woohoo 250th post
biggrin.gif
lol
 
  • #34
Hey I see my post here
smile.gif


My vfts did great all winter with lots and lots of light.I had 4- 40 watt light shop lights with 1 cf that was 40 watts and another that was 25 watts . Once the weather got to hot for the lights I had to move the plants out side in full shade were they had much less light.( Could not put them in our Arizona 115f or they would have cooked) .. the plants are back inside now in a window there still not getting the light they did in the winter.I think the less light was a big part of the reason of why they need to go into the frig now. They started to seem to go dormant as soon as I cut the light back . It was not the temp because there Temps they have been in have been higher then 79f from the time I got them . To be on the safe side I am going to pop them into the frig and put the cape sundews in my green house
smile.gif


_Blue_diamond2077_
 
  • #35
Oh yeah I left out I dont have just 2 Vfts I really have 8 .

3 large RED vtf flowering size plants there the ones that look the worst . < First vfts I got. Plants from this site. Nov/2002

I have mid size green Vft that one is doing a little better but it still looks like its going to need to go in the frig soon . I got that green one 1/12/2003 .

I have 3 very little vfts that I got off of e bay . Im not sure when I got them some time before 1/12/2003 1 out of the 3 died and one is doing really well dont get why.

I also have a red D vft the traps got super small .

All my vfts were doing really great in the winter under the lights. Only when I moved them to an area with less light in june did  they start to slow in growth.

Maybe they thought it was winter when I moved ?




Cant be due to temps we never seem to get cold here in Arizona its 88f now and 8:45 at night .



_-BD-_
alien.gif
 
Back
Top