</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (BobZ @ April 16 2003,08:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">As far as I can tell "Fang" and other such names as "All Green", "All Red", Atlanta", "Bart Simpson", etc are not validly described and published cultivar names. To be sure, a bunch of folks are growing, selling, and trading plants with these names and have posted photos of them on web pages. Without a published description, I wonder how consistent the various plants named, for example, "All Red" are.
In another thread, there was a discussion about 'Red Dragon' seedlings. I, myself, have grown 'Red Dragon' selfed seedlings and can verify that the offspring can be quite variable and not consistent with the parent -- and should not be called 'Red Dragon', unless they conform to the published description. The seed and plants could be called 'Red Dragon' x 'Red Dragon', which gives the correct warnings that they may be variable.[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Yes, it is hard to tell what is what when none have a published discription.
A note on red dragons: They should breed true, but like any breed, not all will be 'show' quality. I also suspect a large number of red dragons are no longer pure bred as people prefer to clone now (aka their are probubly plenty of red dragon look alike hybreds sold under the name). Now, I don't know if the published info on this varient is a bunch of bogus stuff, but what I said is true if it is true.