6--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>
Quote (Tony Paroubek @ Mar. 31 2003,03
6)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Ok couple things..
Monkeyman never said they were labelled and I highly doubt they were.. So using names like bigmouth, fused tooth is not acceptable. You could say they are similar to such and such variety but not use apply the names directly. Darcie is correct in saying southwest giant and slacks giant like.
Also it is not true that all registered varieties are easy to tell apart. And for unregistered ones it is not ok in my book to call any plant by any of those names. They are labelled for a reason. Registered or not has nothing to do it. They are labelled to keep the origin of a specific plant intact.[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Oh, yay, I don't know what Monkeyman saw, although fused tooth is sort of distinctive. I don't like people randomly labling plants either, but it does happen, proticularly with the names "giant" and "Blood Red Trap".
As to registerd varients, what ones do you refer to? The Denta trap group is a little hard to tell, but they have all been lumped into being consitterd the same varient now anyways.
I guess I just don't like how the other plant groups get to be IDed according to traits and just because a lot of VFT's are growing through cloning, they aren't.